2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/7481060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Best Proximity Point Theorems in Locally Convex Spaces Endowed with a Graph

Abstract: We consider the problem of best proximity point in locally convex spaces endowed with a weakly convex digraph. For that, we introduce the notions of nonself G-contraction and G-nonexpansive mappings, and we show that for each seminorm, we have a best proximity point. In addition, we conclude our work with a result showing the existence of best proximity point for every seminorm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An influential best proximity point theorem, attributed to Fan [7], asserts that within a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space H, if K represents a compact and convex nonempty subset, and T stands as a continuous self-mapping over K, then the existence of an element υ within K is guaranteed, satisfying p(υ, Tυ) = p(Tυ, K). This theorem has been extended by several authors, including Chaira et al [1], Chi et al [3], El harmouchi et al [5], Espìnola [6], Prolla [9], Reich [11], Saadaoui et al [12] and Sehgal and Singh [13,14], across a variety of frameworks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…An influential best proximity point theorem, attributed to Fan [7], asserts that within a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space H, if K represents a compact and convex nonempty subset, and T stands as a continuous self-mapping over K, then the existence of an element υ within K is guaranteed, satisfying p(υ, Tυ) = p(Tυ, K). This theorem has been extended by several authors, including Chaira et al [1], Chi et al [3], El harmouchi et al [5], Espìnola [6], Prolla [9], Reich [11], Saadaoui et al [12] and Sehgal and Singh [13,14], across a variety of frameworks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We note also that [35] and [38] contain some results describing the behavior of nonexpansive mappings and best proximity pairs in the language of directed graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A special kind of bipartite graphs, the trees, gives a natural language for the description of ultrametric spaces [1, 2, 6, 9-11, 13-20, 23, 24, 26-28, 32, 35, 36], but the authors are aware of only papers [3] and [36], in which complete bipartite and, more generally, complete multipartite graphs are systematically used to study ultrametric spaces. We note also that [37] and [40] contain some results describing the behavior of nonexpansive mappings and best proximity pairs in terms of directed graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%