2016
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160503.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Consistency of Tests for Stationarity in Autoregressive and Moving Average Models of Different Orders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pengujian dilakukan menggunakan Augmented Dicky Fuller (ADF). Hasil uji ADF bernilai negatif, semakin besar nilai negatif maka semakin kuat penolakan terhadap hipotesis yang menyatakan bahwa terdapat unit root (tidak stasioner) pada beberapa level pengujian (Imam, Habiba, & Atanda, 2016). Adapun aturan dalam pengambilan keputusan stasioneritas data sebagai berikut: 1.…”
Section: Uji Stasioneritas Dataunclassified
“…Pengujian dilakukan menggunakan Augmented Dicky Fuller (ADF). Hasil uji ADF bernilai negatif, semakin besar nilai negatif maka semakin kuat penolakan terhadap hipotesis yang menyatakan bahwa terdapat unit root (tidak stasioner) pada beberapa level pengujian (Imam, Habiba, & Atanda, 2016). Adapun aturan dalam pengambilan keputusan stasioneritas data sebagai berikut: 1.…”
Section: Uji Stasioneritas Dataunclassified
“…In this study a significance level of 5% was maintained for all hypothesis tests. Imam [18]. According to the tests performed, first the series was normal but nonstationary.…”
Section: Procedures Followedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or import and export data can be predicted by using information on how many is imported and exported in the past few months. Many examples can be given and these ARMA-models work pretty well in modeling the time series (Imam, 2020). One special class of time series model is ARIMA models which are often associated with Box and Jenkins (1976) for their effort to systematize the whole methodology of estimating, checking and forecasting using ARIMA models (Mahesh, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated variation in precision, M 3 performed best in one-week ahead and 9-12 weeks ahead while M4 performed better in 2-8 weeks and also for 13 weeks and above, M 1 was the weak model in forecasting. Imam (2020) investigated the best ARIMA model for forecasting average daily share price indices of the series of square pharmaceuticals limited (SPL). After stationary test, the data was found to be not stationary; a differencing was carried out to obtain stationarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%