2002
DOI: 10.1109/66.999587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On designing sub-70-nm semiconductor materials and processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the analysis of the STM image we calculate an average height difference from peak to valley of ~ 1 nm (which corresponds to ~7 atomic steps) and a root mean square surface roughness ~ 0.95 Å. We observe randomly distributed small mounds that appear as bright features in figure 1(a), with a typical area of ~ 3×3 nm 2 and an apparent height of ~5 Å, as reported previously for Ge(001) surfaces prepared with different methods [25,26]. The exact origin of these features will be the subject of a future detailed STS study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the analysis of the STM image we calculate an average height difference from peak to valley of ~ 1 nm (which corresponds to ~7 atomic steps) and a root mean square surface roughness ~ 0.95 Å. We observe randomly distributed small mounds that appear as bright features in figure 1(a), with a typical area of ~ 3×3 nm 2 and an apparent height of ~5 Å, as reported previously for Ge(001) surfaces prepared with different methods [25,26]. The exact origin of these features will be the subject of a future detailed STS study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Electronic device miniaturization to and beyond the 16 nm node requires technological progress other than standard scaling of silicon (Si) complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology [1]. This includes replacing Si in transistors with alternative high-mobility channel materials and developing technologies capable of miniaturizing devices at the atomic-scale, where atomically abrupt dopant profiles and interfaces are required [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ge-based atomic scale-devices are particularly interesting since the electronic device miniaturization to and beyond the 16-nm-node foresees the replacement of Si channel in transistors with higher mobility materials 4,5 and requires, ultimately, the development of technologies capable of miniaturizing devices at the atomic-scale. 6 Any design of future atomic-scale Ge devices -such as ultra-shallow abrupt junctions, ballistic transistors or quantum coherent devices -requires a detailed knowledge of the carrier transport properties in the starting two-dimensional (2D) Ge:P -doped layer as a function of the fabrication process parameters. Previous studies on Si:P -doped layers have highlighted the crucial role of the temperature at which the encapsulation layer is grown (T g ) in determining the spatial confinement and electronic transport properties of dopants due to the interplay between epi-layer crystal quality and dopant segregation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In silicon, multiple dÀlayers have also been grown to investigate the formation of ultra-shallow junction layers [10]. If combined with scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) dÀdoping can be used to fabricate ultra-shallow junctions with atomically abrupt doping profiles, allowing the controlled positioning of dopants in all three spatial dimensions [11]. This combined approach provides a route towards the fabrication of novel device structures such as atomic-scale dÀFETs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%