2021
DOI: 10.5334/tismir.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Evaluation of Inter- and Intra-Rater Agreement in Music Recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, the proposed HC and MIX methods appear to significantly outperform the random baseline for SGD and XGB models. This finding leads us to promote the creation of subjectivity-aware machine learning methods which could have a high impact in novel applications of immersion in virtual reality (Warp et al, 2022) and emotion-based music recommendation (Grekow, 2021;Tarnowska, 2021)-several other tasks display low inter-rater agreement too: music auto-tagging (Bigand & Aucouturier, 2013), music similarity and diversity (Flexer et al, 2021;Porcaro et al, 2022), automatic chord estimation (Koops et al, 2019), and beat tracking (Holzapfel et al, 2012). In short, MER has been openly criticized due to the subjectivity issue (Gómez-Cañónet al, 2021) -however we advocate for "embracing subjectivity and potentially leveraging the opportunities it offers for better learning" (Rizos & Schuller, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, the proposed HC and MIX methods appear to significantly outperform the random baseline for SGD and XGB models. This finding leads us to promote the creation of subjectivity-aware machine learning methods which could have a high impact in novel applications of immersion in virtual reality (Warp et al, 2022) and emotion-based music recommendation (Grekow, 2021;Tarnowska, 2021)-several other tasks display low inter-rater agreement too: music auto-tagging (Bigand & Aucouturier, 2013), music similarity and diversity (Flexer et al, 2021;Porcaro et al, 2022), automatic chord estimation (Koops et al, 2019), and beat tracking (Holzapfel et al, 2012). In short, MER has been openly criticized due to the subjectivity issue (Gómez-Cañónet al, 2021) -however we advocate for "embracing subjectivity and potentially leveraging the opportunities it offers for better learning" (Rizos & Schuller, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, the proposed HC and MIX methods appear to significantly outperform the random baseline for SGD and XGB models. This finding leads us to promote the creation of subjectivityaware machine learning methods -several other tasks have low inter-rater agreement too (music auto-tagging [65], music similarity and diversity [66,67], automatic chord estimation [68], and beat tracking [69]). In short, MER has been openly criticized due to the subjectivity issue [6] -however we advocate for "embracing subjectivity and potentially leveraging the opportunities it offers for better learning" [70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale yields measures of moods including pleasant-unpleasant mood, arousal-calm mood, as well as scores for positive-tired and negative-calm mood (Mayer & Gaschke, 1988). The scale has been validated in numerous studies, including Aldrich et al (2021), Flexer et al (2021), andNugraha et al (2020). In order to evaluate any possible correlation between subjective assessment and quantitatively gathered data, participants filled out a BMIS form after each condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%