2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On non-monotonic ageing properties from the Laplace transform, with actuarial applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We shall prove the analogus result for the IDMRL class of life distributions. To prove the theorem, we shall need a result which is proved in Belzunce et al (2007) using total positivity theory. For completeness, we give the result in Lemma 3.1 below.…”
Section: Poisson Shock Models Leading To Idmrl Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall prove the analogus result for the IDMRL class of life distributions. To prove the theorem, we shall need a result which is proved in Belzunce et al (2007) using total positivity theory. For completeness, we give the result in Lemma 3.1 below.…”
Section: Poisson Shock Models Leading To Idmrl Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential complexity of the difference is illustrated by 'simple' examples in Table 1. Despite the complex relationship between the original and new MRL functions, Belzunce, Ortega & Ruiz (2007) show that if the MRL function µ(t) is UBT, then its turning point τ * is smaller then the turning point τ * λ of µ λ (t), for every λ > 0. From this, using Theorem 3, we infer several facts.…”
Section: Interactions Between Hazard Rate and Mean Residual Life Funcmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Assuming that the insurer provides a payment of one monetary unit after death, then the net prospective premium reserve V X ( t ; δ , β ) is given by (see the book of Rolski et al31(p352)) VX(t;δ,β)=Eeδ(Xt)|X>tβE0XteδxdxX>t, where δ > 0 is the force of interest and β > 0 is the constant premium rate. Integrating by parts, we have (see the work of Belzunce et al) VXfalse(t;δ,βfalse)=1false(δ+βfalse)0.1emtrueaXfalse(t;δfalse), where trueaXfalse(t;δfalse) is defined in . Similarly, let V Y ( t ; δ , β ) denote the net prospective premium reserve of the lifetime Y , so that VX(t;δ,β)VY(t;δ,β)=(δ+β)[atrue‾Y(t;δ)atrue‾X(t;δ)]. Hence, by applying Proposition , we have that the difference between the net prospective premium reserves of the considered life...…”
Section: Additive Hazard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%