2011
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2011.2167242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-Orbit Error Rates of RHBD SRAMs: Comparison of Calculation Techniques and Space Environmental Models With Observed Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite we used the same LET spectra, our calculation scheme provides the unambiguous results that do not depend on the choice of the ill-defined model parameters. Notice that our SER predictions are rather close to on-orbit 1.8×10 -10 errors/bit/day, indicated in [24]. We have found that the use of logarithmic interpolation is a critical point since the neglect of the region C    leads to a strong underestimate in SER.…”
Section: Rhbd Sram On-orbit Data Analysissupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite we used the same LET spectra, our calculation scheme provides the unambiguous results that do not depend on the choice of the ill-defined model parameters. Notice that our SER predictions are rather close to on-orbit 1.8×10 -10 errors/bit/day, indicated in [24]. We have found that the use of logarithmic interpolation is a critical point since the neglect of the region C    leads to a strong underestimate in SER.…”
Section: Rhbd Sram On-orbit Data Analysissupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Approximation of the cross section data (adapted from [23]) with equation (7) Bogorad et al [24] provided the results of the SER calculations and some on-orbit SER data for the same SRAMs. In-flight data [24] 1.8×10 -10 errors/bit/day A comparison between the IRPP calculations [24] and our compact simulations with the parameters in Fig. 9 is presented in a Table V.…”
Section: Rhbd Sram On-orbit Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reference, [18] reports a worst case error rate of around 10 −16 errors/cycle for a space environment and [19] uses an injection rate of 10 −8 errors/cycle, assuming a clock frequency of 1GHz. Since the cycle overheads are negligible even for a 1 million cycle checkpoint interval (the overhead ratio there is 2.6 × 10 −7 on the Perror = 10 −12 line), the data shows that we can easily achieve the error removal limit of 99.83% with negligible performance cost.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, any circuit C without feedback loop will return, after an SEU, to a correct state before K clock cycles, provided that K is larger than the maximal length of the simple paths in G C (paths without repeating vertices). In environments with high levels of ionizing radiations (e.g., space, particle accelerators), K is bigger than 10 10 [5]. So, even if our approach can deal with any K, we can assume that K is larger than the max length of all simple paths in G C .…”
Section: Syntactic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%