On second-order observation and genuine pretending

Abstract

This paper discusses the meaning of the concept of ‘second-order observation’ used by Niklas Luhmann (1927–1998). Luhmann identifies second-order observation as a defining characteristic of modern world society. According to Luhmann, all social systems construct a social reality on the basis of the observation of observations. Rating agencies in the economy or the peer-review process in the academic system are examples of social mechanisms manifesting second-order observation. Social media also represent organized second-order observation. The paper suggests that in a society based on second-order observation, ‘genuine pretending’ is an adequate mode of existence. This notion is derived from the Daoist text Zhuangzi. It indicates a disassociation from social roles which allows their performers to exercise these roles with ease and, at the same time, maintain a state of sanity.

Ctrl+Alt+Delete in the name of COVID-19: When a reset leads to misrecognition

“…Analytically, we apply a second order observation (Luhmann 1993, Andersen, 2003 , Moeller, 2017 ). This implies that we are not interested in placing a verdict on the extent to which the Danish mink farmers actually have been misrecognised from an independent point of view.…”

Moral communication observed with social systems theory. An introduction

“…Simply put, first-order observation refers to the observation of "some-thing" and secondorder observation to the observation of observes (Andersen, 2003;Moeller, 2017Moeller, , 2020. In a functionally differentiated society without ultimate hierarchy or authoritative center, second-order observations have become the dominant mode of observation as they define, for example, how scientist observe the quality of a journal (Moeller, 2017). Second-order observations are not simply free-floating observations though.…”

The rise and change of the competence strategy: Reflections on twenty-five years of skills policies in the EU

“…It appears paradoxical that the more we concern ourselves with the effectiveness of education the less certain we feel about its very effectiveness. Yet such paradoxes are highly characteristic of late modernity (Moeller, 2017).…”