2019
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/393/1/012056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the development of measurement procedure of particle density for peat material

Abstract: Value of particle density of tropical peat materials commonly is considered to be 1.4 g/cm3. This value was based on the measurementusing a pycnometer. However, this value would not be correct for tropical peat that has coarse material that could plug the narrow opening of the pycnometer. Hence, the use of pycnometer to measure particle density of tropical peat material has a possibility to get false values because the coarse material will inhibit the measurement process. Therefore, we are proposing the use of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where F CO 2 ÀAEA is the AEA-induced production of CO 2 in an incubation in μmol g À1 , C AEA is the concentration of alternative electron acceptors (μmol L À1 ), ρ is the density of wet soil (1550 g L À1 ) (Faoziah et al 2019), and α the equivalence factor for CO 2 produced per mole AEA reduced for either AMO or R ana , respectively (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Rationalization Of Ratios Deviating From Conrad's Idealized ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where F CO 2 ÀAEA is the AEA-induced production of CO 2 in an incubation in μmol g À1 , C AEA is the concentration of alternative electron acceptors (μmol L À1 ), ρ is the density of wet soil (1550 g L À1 ) (Faoziah et al 2019), and α the equivalence factor for CO 2 produced per mole AEA reduced for either AMO or R ana , respectively (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Rationalization Of Ratios Deviating From Conrad's Idealized ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As outlined above, we would expect any truly anoxic, methanogenic system to be depleted in alternative electron acceptors (e.g., porewater NO3, SO42, Fe 3+ , or Mn 4+ ). To exclude the possibility, however, of such low CH 4 to CO 2 ratios being due the production of CO 2 from AEAs‐induced CO 2 here we have estimated their contribution through anaerobic methane oxidation (AMO) or anaerobic respiration ( R ana ): FCO2AEA=CAEA×αρ PCO2AEA=FCO2AEAFCO2tot=FCO2AEARCO2×Dincubation×100% where FCO2AEA is the AEA‐induced production of CO 2 in an incubation in μ mol g −1 , C AEA is the concentration of alternative electron acceptors ( μ mol L −1 ), ρ is the density of wet soil (1550 g L −1 ) (Faoziah et al 2019), and α the equivalence factor for CO 2 produced per mole AEA reduced for either AMO or R ana , respectively (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Rationalization Of Ratios Deviating From Conrad's Idealized ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nilai densitas partikel 1,4 g / cm3 yang saat ini digunakan sebagai acuan tergolong rendah. Nilai berat jenis partikel gambut tropis dan subtropis yang bervariasi di atas 1,4 g / cm3 (Faoziah, Iskandar, Djajakirana, Darmawan, & Sumawinata, 2019). Angka berat jenis partikel harus lebih tinggi dibandingkan nilai bobot isi, karena semua pori sudah dikeluarkan.…”
Section: Iii) Berat Jenis Partikelunclassified