1995
DOI: 10.1016/0165-2125(94)00049-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the diffraction of high-frequency waves by a cone of arbitrary shape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is indeed only "naturally convergent" for a very restricted range of ordered pairs (ω, ω 0 ). On this restricted range of ordered pairs, (2) can indeed be written as an exponentially convergent integral as shown in [9] and implemented in [10]. In the particular case of an axi-symmetric problem, Babich et al showed in [10] that, using earlier ideas of Nikolaev [25], (2) could be modified into an exponentially convergent integral everywhere.…”
Section: Notations and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is indeed only "naturally convergent" for a very restricted range of ordered pairs (ω, ω 0 ). On this restricted range of ordered pairs, (2) can indeed be written as an exponentially convergent integral as shown in [9] and implemented in [10]. In the particular case of an axi-symmetric problem, Babich et al showed in [10] that, using earlier ideas of Nikolaev [25], (2) could be modified into an exponentially convergent integral everywhere.…”
Section: Notations and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this restricted range of ordered pairs, (2) can indeed be written as an exponentially convergent integral as shown in [9] and implemented in [10]. In the particular case of an axi-symmetric problem, Babich et al showed in [10] that, using earlier ideas of Nikolaev [25], (2) could be modified into an exponentially convergent integral everywhere. In a more recent paper, Shanin [13] improved (2) by introducing three modified Smyshlyaev formulae in the Dirichlet case.…”
Section: Notations and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then both the scattered wave U sc and the total wave U := U inc + U sc satisfy the three-dimensional Helmholtz equation, (Δ + k 2 )U = 0, in the domain of propagation, and U sc satisfies an appropriate version of the radiation conditions. The theory in [33,4,6] describes the behavior of the diffracted component U diff (x) of U sc (x) at any point x in the domain of propagation. Using spherical coordinates centered at the conical point-x = rω with ω ∈ S 2 and r > 0 denoting the distance of x from the conical point-it follows from the general recipes of the GTD that (with either Dirichlet or Neumann conditions imposed on the surface of the scatterer) U diff has the asymptotic representation…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this solution has long been suspected to be wrong (see Meister, 1987), and indeed it has recently been disproved by Albani (2007). A different way to attack the quarter-plane problem has been introduced by Smyshlyaev (1990), followed by some work by Babich et al (1995), but in this case the solution is still difficult to evaluate numerically. Despite this difficulty, Babich et al (2000) describe a numerical method based on the Abel-Poisson-type summation method and a boundary integral equation that gives the diffraction coefficient for smooth convex cones in the non-singular directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%