analysis. After further discussions, this was indeed confirmed. One mistake was an oversight, whereas the second one was more subtle. It turns out that the first mistake has impacts on the results of the paper, whereas the second one can be repaired and hence has no effect on the results. The oversight appears in Sect. 4.1 where the basic reproduction number R BA 0 for the SEIR-ω model is derived, and it only affects the case αω EI > 0. There the probability for an exposed but not yet infectious individual to rewire away from its infector, and reconnect to a new (susceptible) individual, is computed. The competing events are that the exposed individual rewires (at rate ω EI and only with probability α does the individual reconnect to a new individual), that the individual becomes infectious (when he/she stops rewiring), but also if the infector stops being infectious and recovers, The online version of the original article can be found under