2016
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2016.280.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the equivalence of the definitions of volume of representations

Abstract: Let G be a rank 1 simple Lie group and M be a connected, orientable, aspherical, tame manifold. Assume that each end of M has amenable fundamental group. There are several definitions of volume of representations of π1(M ) into G. We give a new definition of volume of representations and furthermore, show that all definitions so far are equivalent.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a detailed proof, see [15]. Hence the two different definitions of Francaviglia-Klaff [10] and Bucher-Burger-Iozzi [2] for the volume of a representation of a nonuniform lattice give the same value.…”
Section: Reformulation Of the Volume Of Representationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a detailed proof, see [15]. Hence the two different definitions of Francaviglia-Klaff [10] and Bucher-Burger-Iozzi [2] for the volume of a representation of a nonuniform lattice give the same value.…”
Section: Reformulation Of the Volume Of Representationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The authors [16] give a definition of the volume of a representation for a nonuniform lattice in a semisimple Lie group through bounded cohomology, 1 -homology and simplicial volume. In fact, in the case of hyperbolic lattices, it turns out that all definitions of the volume of a representation give the same value [15]. For further details, see [16,Section 6] (a similar proof works for any dimension) and Section 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Firstly, we will recall some definitions on the cohomology group of a topological space with a group action, we refer to [34] and the references therein. Let X be a topological space and G be a group acting continuously on X.…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Define F * alt,b (X, R) as the subspace of F * alt (X, R) consisting of bounded alternating functions. The coboundary operator restricts to the complex F * alt,b (X, R) G and so it defines a cohomology, denoted by H * b (X; G, R), see [16] and also [34,Section 3]. In particular, for a manifold X,…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation