On the evolutionary character of North's idea of institutional change

Abstract

The main objective is to discuss the historical-evolutionary character of the latest work of Douglass North. His views have been lately criticized, especially as far as their historical insight is concerned, as well as the nature of the concepts and the ideas he used. Three interconnected arguments dealing with North's neoclassical roots, his individualistic point of departure and his inclination to universalistic explanations sustain this allegation, and they will be presented in the first part. In the second part, a response to these arguments is suggested. Finally, the evolutionary character of his later work is discussed and established in the last part. It is held that by introducing ‘culture’ into the heart of the analysis of institutional change, North is oriented toward context dependent and consequently historically specific explanations.

The tortoise and the hare: how North's institutional ideas resolved a 19th century Australian fable

“…However, the 'latter day' North became more old institutional, giving prominence to how institutions shape the behaviour of individuals, and this is also reflected in the design of the current study. From 1990, North linked together history (time), economics, political science, sociology, and other social sciences and highlighted how norms and beliefs constitute and regulate the actions of individuals (see Zouboulakis 2005).…”

The New Institutional Economics: Its Start, Its Meaning, Its Prospects

“…50 See Fine and Milonakis (2003) and Milonakis and Fine (2005). 51 For a brief review and assessment of the criticisms of North's NIEH see Zouboulakis (2005). 52 As opposed to Chap.…”

Douglass North’s Theory of Institutions: Lessons for Law and Development

“… North (2005a, pp. 32/3, 36, 51); see alsoZouboulakis (2005).Douglass North's Theory of Institutions: Lessons for Law… …”