2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2019.108404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Fourier analysis of measures with Meyer set support

Abstract: In this paper we show the existence of the generalized Eberlein decomposition for Fourier transformable measures with Meyer set support. We prove that each of the three components is also Fourier transformable and has Meyer set support. We obtain that each of the pure point, absolutely continuous and singular continuous components of the Fourier transform is a strong almost periodic measure, and hence is either trivial or has relatively dense support. We next prove that the Fourier transform of a measure with … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, in this article, we discuss deformed weighted model sets as a substantial subclass of SAP measures. We will prove that deformed weighted model sets with continuous and compactly supported weight and deformation functions are strongly almost periodic, thereby extending older results for weighted model sets [11,45,58,65,66]. We will then deform such structures using continuous almost periodic modulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Hence, in this article, we discuss deformed weighted model sets as a substantial subclass of SAP measures. We will prove that deformed weighted model sets with continuous and compactly supported weight and deformation functions are strongly almost periodic, thereby extending older results for weighted model sets [11,45,58,65,66]. We will then deform such structures using continuous almost periodic modulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The matrix B is obtained by first taking the ?-map of the setvalued displacement matrix T of equation 4and then its inverse Fourier transform. For this reason, B is called the internal Fourier matrix (Baake & Grimm, 2019b), to distinguish it from the Fourier matrix of the renormalization approach in physical space (Baake & Gä hler, 2016;Baake, Frank et al, 2019); see Bufetov & Solomyak (2018, 2020 for various extensions with more flexibility in the choice of the interval lengths. In Dirac notation, we set jhi ¼ ðh a ; h b Þ T , which satisfies jhð0Þi ¼ jvi with the right eigenvector jvi of the substitution matrix M from equation 2.…”
Section: Renormalization and Internal Cocyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, these matrices satisfy B ð1Þ ¼ B and B ðnÞ ð0Þ ¼ M n for all n 2 N, where M is the substitution matrix from equation 1, as well as the relations B ðnþmÞ ðyÞ ¼ B ðnÞ ðyÞ B ðmÞ ð n yÞ ð 19Þ for any m; n 2 N. Note that B ðnÞ ðyÞ defines a matrix cocycle, called the internal cocycle, which is related to the usual inflation cocycle (in physical space) by an application of the ?-map to the displacement matrices of the powers of the inflation rule; compare Baake, Gä hler & Mañ ibo (2019), Baake & Grimm (2019b), and see Bufetov & Solomyak (2018, 2020 for a similar approach. Note also that jj < 1, which means that n approaches 0 exponentially fast as n !…”
Section: Renormalization and Internal Cocyclementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Without loss of generality, we may assume that F and F are minimal in this sense. Then, applying [45, Remark 5] to the measure γ=μ̂, we gain the existence of a finite measure ν on G such that μ=trueμ̂̂=xnormalΓχFχ(x)0.16emδx*ν,where μfalse(gfalse):=μfalse(gIfalse) with I(x)=x, so (μ)=μ and (μν)=μν. Consequently, with (δx)=δx and χfalse(xfalse)=χ(x)¯, one gets μ=xnormalΓχFχfalse(xfalse)¯0.16emδx*ν. Define the measures ν1:=xΓ+Fνfalse{xfalse}…”
Section: Measures With Meyer Set Support and Sparse Fbsmentioning
confidence: 99%