2020
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the influence of the modelling of superhydrophobic surfaces on laminar–turbulent transition

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the effect of the gas-liquid interface motion on the optimal growth and on the consequent transition scenarios, remains to be investigated. Using a moving-boundary technique for modeling the SHS surfaces, Picella et al [65] found that the strong ejection events induced by the interface motion can contrast the sweep-like effect of the boundary slip, leading to a transition scenario very similar to that observed in the no-slip case. This study suggests that the optimal solutions may remain robust also in the presence of interface motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the effect of the gas-liquid interface motion on the optimal growth and on the consequent transition scenarios, remains to be investigated. Using a moving-boundary technique for modeling the SHS surfaces, Picella et al [65] found that the strong ejection events induced by the interface motion can contrast the sweep-like effect of the boundary slip, leading to a transition scenario very similar to that observed in the no-slip case. This study suggests that the optimal solutions may remain robust also in the presence of interface motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the present work shows that wall slip has a strong potential in stabilizing optimal ejection-like events, although it can be not effective, or even detrimental, in the case of core perturbations. However, it has been recently shown [65] that, for sufficiently large (but wetting-stable) micro-roughnesses, the gas-liquid interface motion may partially hinder the transition delay effect of the wall slip. Thus, it would be crucial to investigate the robustness of these conclusions about the effect of SHS on optimal energy growth mechanisms with respect to the presence of gas-liquid interface motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The validity of linear stability results on laminar–turbulent transition itself, which is an intrinsically nonlinear phenomenon, has been recently assessed by Picella, Robinet & Cherubini (2019, 2020), who have confirmed that SH surfaces strongly influence transition induced by wall-close disturbances, such as TS waves, even at subcritical Reynolds number, but have a weak effect on the subcritical growth of coherent structures lying farther from the wall, such as streaks and streamwise vortices. Cherubini, Picella & Robinet (2021) reported a strong effect of boundary slip on the transient growth of nonlinear optimal perturbations: in particular, while the maximal energy growth is considerably decreased, the shape of the optimal perturbation barely changes, indicating the robustness of optimal perturbations with respect to wall slip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…They study the evolution of both modal and non-modal disturbances, and show that SHS may be used to delay transition in the former and have no effect on the latter. Extending these works, Picella, Robinet & Cherubini (2020) then impose correct mixed boundary conditions to study the effects of the interface dynamics on transition. They find that transition again occurs further downstream, however, the stabilisation effects are reduced relative to the slip conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%