1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf03155576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the mechanism of photon emission from thin film tunnel structures

Abstract: The light emission from AI--AI2Os--M planar tunnel diodes was investigated where M = Ag, Au or Cu. Experiments on smooth and periodieally corrugated (holographie grating) substrates showed that the emitted light originates from surface plasmons seattered by the surface roughness and, probably, from the bremsstrahlung of tunneling eleetrons. AII the three noble metals show qualitatively similar behaviour and their light emission can be described as the superposition of three independent sources. The quantum eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the outstanding challenge is to understand the underlying light-creation mechanisms based on inelastically-tunneling electrons. Moreover, the spectral observations from [22] are inconsistent to other reports, and the originally anticipated quantum condition (E emission = hv = qV bias (1) [23], where v is the frequency, q the charge, V bias the applied voltage bias, and h Planks constant) is experimentally not validated [20,22,24,25]. The argument of a convolution between the spectral-dependent tunnel current and the device-internal plasmon was made to explain the deviation from (1), as further validated in results presented here [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the outstanding challenge is to understand the underlying light-creation mechanisms based on inelastically-tunneling electrons. Moreover, the spectral observations from [22] are inconsistent to other reports, and the originally anticipated quantum condition (E emission = hv = qV bias (1) [23], where v is the frequency, q the charge, V bias the applied voltage bias, and h Planks constant) is experimentally not validated [20,22,24,25]. The argument of a convolution between the spectral-dependent tunnel current and the device-internal plasmon was made to explain the deviation from (1), as further validated in results presented here [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Moreover, the spectral observations from ref 23 are inconsistent to other reports, and the originally anticipated quantum condition (E emission = hv = qV bias , 24 where v is the frequency, q the charge, V bias the applied voltage bias, and h Planck constant) is experimentally not validated. 19,23,25,26 This can be attributed to the fact that (a) increasing the electron energy distribution via hot carriers can change the quantum condition (e.g., hv > qV bias ), 26 which is a first order effect, and (b) the emission is governed by the overlap integral of the energy-dependent tunnel current with the modal dispersion. The argument of a convolution between the spectral-dependent tunnel current and the device-internal plasmon was made to explain the deviation from hv = qV bias , as further validated in results presented here.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%