2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(00)00472-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the need for another type of predictive model in structured foods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The microorganisms studied there diffused some centimeters over hours or days, which led to calculated apparent diffusion coefficients that were 3 log levels higher than the ones calculated in this study (Table 1). Moreover, determination of diffusion coefficients of Escherichia coli in liquid model systems yielded diffusion coefficients of 1.6 × 10 −8 to 5.5 × 10 −11 m 2 /s (Adler & Dahl, 1967;Dens & Van Impe, 2001;Lovely & Dahlquist, 1975). These findings are in line with the calculated apparent diffusion coefficients shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The microorganisms studied there diffused some centimeters over hours or days, which led to calculated apparent diffusion coefficients that were 3 log levels higher than the ones calculated in this study (Table 1). Moreover, determination of diffusion coefficients of Escherichia coli in liquid model systems yielded diffusion coefficients of 1.6 × 10 −8 to 5.5 × 10 −11 m 2 /s (Adler & Dahl, 1967;Dens & Van Impe, 2001;Lovely & Dahlquist, 1975). These findings are in line with the calculated apparent diffusion coefficients shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The distance that particles traveled over a defined time was determined by image analysis and is hence referred to as the mean distance. If the apparent diffusion coefficient is very high the particles can diffuse without any limitations whereas an apparent diffusion coefficient of zero indicates no movement of particles in the system (Dens & Van Impe, 2001). …”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a 16S rRNA community fingerprinting approach, we showed that bacterial diversity in soil increased as water potential decreased (water content decreased) ( Table 1). Previous studies have shown that the coexistence of different bacterial species is favored by low water potential (16,17,30,31,48). However, these studies measured competition between only two bacterial species for a single substrate and were either modeling studies (17,30,31) or laboratory studies using agar or artificial soil (16,48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low pore connectivity in soil may hinder the capacity of competitive organisms to decrease substrate availability to competitors and create opportunities for diffusional and spatial "sheltering" of less competitive organisms (30,48). In modeling studies of bacterial competition, slow diffusion of substrates and low motility were thought to explain the coexistence of competing bacteria on rough surfaces (30,31) and in solid foods (17). The theory of pore connectivity may provide a fundamental theory to explain the high diversity of bacteria in soil.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%