2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
317
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(349 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
15
317
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Oulasvirta and Salovaara (2004) propose a memory-based approach that would present interruptions during low working memory load and provide retrieval cues allowing the user to mentally restore the cognitive state necessary to resume the interrupted task. Adamczyk and Bailey (2004) and Bailey and Konstan (2006) have studied the impact of interruptions at different times in a task execution. Basing their work on event perception theories, the authors represent tasks as two level hierarchies composed of coarse events further split into fine events (for example, a coarse event would be the selection of the email application, which would then be further decomposed in selecting the email application, typing in the username, and typing in the password).…”
Section: Timing Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oulasvirta and Salovaara (2004) propose a memory-based approach that would present interruptions during low working memory load and provide retrieval cues allowing the user to mentally restore the cognitive state necessary to resume the interrupted task. Adamczyk and Bailey (2004) and Bailey and Konstan (2006) have studied the impact of interruptions at different times in a task execution. Basing their work on event perception theories, the authors represent tasks as two level hierarchies composed of coarse events further split into fine events (for example, a coarse event would be the selection of the email application, which would then be further decomposed in selecting the email application, typing in the username, and typing in the password).…”
Section: Timing Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…annoyance, frustration, well-being, stress, anxiety, are additional aspects that have received focus (e.g. Bailey and Konstan 2006;Cohen 1980;Zijlstra et al 1999). …”
Section: Interruptions In Cognitive Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadly speaking, without reviewing the extensive literature on the issue of interruption research specifically, it seems that there are some consistent findings that demonstrate a range of negative outcomes associated with frequently occurring interruptions. These include increased amounts of errors (Iqbal and Horvitz 2007), decreased efficiency resulting in longer completion times and sometimes uncompleted and forgotten tasks (Bailey and Konstan 2006), feelings of irritation, stress and anxiety (Mark et al 2008), and even cognitive fatigue (Cohen 1980). However, it should be noted that the current body of the literature on, and existing knowledge of, interruptions is mostly based on experimental studies, which are not necessarily generalisable to non-experimental contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensive care unit nurses are distracted about every three minutes and interrupt their task at hand almost seven times an hour (Grundgeiger et al, 2010). Interruptions have been associated with errors or degraded performance in healthcare (Westbrook et al, 2010), aviation (Loukopoulos et al, 2003), and human-computer interaction (Bailey and Konstan, 2006). In the literature, definitions of interruptions typically note the unexpected nature of the interruption and the prompt cessation of the task at hand due to the interrupting task (Brixey et al, 2007;Trafton et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%