2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(02)01130-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the non-linear I–V characteristics of dc magnetron sputtered TiO2 thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, these authors indicated that conductivity in R was through excitations of small polaronic states (see below), resulting in m e values of ∼20m 0 (based on references in [110]). Their assessment of m e in A being ∼m 0 is consistent with measurements by other groups [417,418] for thin A films and by DFT theory [413], although one report places m e > 10m 0 for A [127]. As yet, there appear to be no measurements reported on high quality single crystal A.…”
Section: Carrier Effective Masssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast, these authors indicated that conductivity in R was through excitations of small polaronic states (see below), resulting in m e values of ∼20m 0 (based on references in [110]). Their assessment of m e in A being ∼m 0 is consistent with measurements by other groups [417,418] for thin A films and by DFT theory [413], although one report places m e > 10m 0 for A [127]. As yet, there appear to be no measurements reported on high quality single crystal A.…”
Section: Carrier Effective Masssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Monticone et al take the anatase TiO 2 electron effective mass to be equal to m e = 10 m 0 [7]. On the one hand, Pascual and co-workers obtained m e = 3 m 0 [8], whereas on the other hand Stamate recently reported a value of m e = (0.71-1.26) m 0 [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large amount of uncertainty concerning the value of electron effective mass in TiO 2 obtained experimentally (typically, they are obtained from the analysis of Hall coefficients, conductivity and thermoelectric power): values for rutile have been reported in the range between 5 m e and 13 m e [79] [80] [81] [82] and as large as 12-32 m e [83]; however, it has been argued that the measured value is the mass of a polaron, while the mass of a bare electron is smaller, of the order of 3 m e [80] or 6-7 m e [84]. For anatase nanoparticles, the measured values are much smaller, ~1 m e [85] or 0.71-1.26 m e [86] depending on particle size. DFT calculations show that electron effective mass in both rutile and anatase is strongly anisotropic, between 0.6-1.2 m e for rutile [87] [88] and 0.04-0.48 for anatase [88]; optical effective mass which takes into account all occupied states in the conduction band has been calculated as ~0.5 m e and ~4 m e (direction-dependent) for anatase [89].…”
Section: Choice Of the Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%