2013
DOI: 10.5194/cp-9-583-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the origin of multidecadal to centennial Greenland temperature anomalies over the past 800 yr

Abstract: The surface temperature of the Greenland ice sheet is among the most important climate variables for assessing how climate change may impact human societies due to its association with sea level rise. However, the causes of multidecadal-to-centennial temperature changes in Greenland temperatures are not well understood, largely owing to short observational records. To examine these, we calculated the Greenland temperature anomalies (GTA[G-NH]) over the past 800 yr by subtracting the standardized nor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this theory, Greenland temperatures have deviated negatively (positively) from the NH temperature trend when solar activity was stronger (weaker) over the past 800 yr (Kobashi et al, 2013). Climate modelling also indicates that the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) reduces (increases) during weaker (stronger) solar activity (Cubasch et al, 1997;Waple et al, 2002), contributing to negative Greenland temperature responses to solar variability (Kobashi et al, 2013). Currently, the past variations of NAO and/or AMOC (e.g.…”
Section: T Kobashi Et Al: Causes Of Greenland Temperature Variabilisupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with this theory, Greenland temperatures have deviated negatively (positively) from the NH temperature trend when solar activity was stronger (weaker) over the past 800 yr (Kobashi et al, 2013). Climate modelling also indicates that the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) reduces (increases) during weaker (stronger) solar activity (Cubasch et al, 1997;Waple et al, 2002), contributing to negative Greenland temperature responses to solar variability (Kobashi et al, 2013). Currently, the past variations of NAO and/or AMOC (e.g.…”
Section: T Kobashi Et Al: Causes Of Greenland Temperature Variabilisupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Therefore, it can be expected that stronger (weaker) solar activity induces warming (cooling) in NH temperature, and relative cooling (warming) in Greenland through positive (negative) NAO. Consistent with this theory, Greenland temperatures have deviated negatively (positively) from the NH temperature trend when solar activity was stronger (weaker) over the past 800 yr (Kobashi et al, 2013). Climate modelling also indicates that the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) reduces (increases) during weaker (stronger) solar activity (Cubasch et al, 1997;Waple et al, 2002), contributing to negative Greenland temperature responses to solar variability (Kobashi et al, 2013).…”
Section: T Kobashi Et Al: Causes Of Greenland Temperature Variabilimentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, regional climate may further deviate from the hemispheric trend owing to regional atmospheric and oceanic circulation changes induced by forcing (e.g., solar activity). For example, stronger (weaker) solar activity produced negative (positive) temperature anomalies from the hemispheric temperature trend in Greenland (Figures 3b and 3c) [Kobashi et al, 2013a[Kobashi et al, , 2013b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also note that the standard deviation (0.07 ‰) of δ 15 N × 11 in GISP2 is much smaller than standard deviation of raw δAr/N 2 (1.33 ‰) over the past 6000 years, indicating that the variations of δAr/N 2corr mostly originate from the raw δAr/N 2 and not from δ 15 N. For the sake of simplicity, we denote all the δAr/N 2corr as δAr/N 2 in later sections. The significance of correlations were calculated considering the autocorrelation of time series (Ito and Minobe, 2010;Kobashi et al, 2013). We consider > 95 % confidence as significant, unless otherwise noted.…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%