1898
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9904-1898-00531-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the polynomials of Stieltjes

Abstract: ON THE POLYNOMIALS OF STIELTJES. * The proof given by Stieljes in the sixth volume of the Acta Mathematica is based upon mechanical considerations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, for fixed k, the Van Vleck zeros are distinct and also lie within (α 1 , α 3 ). The proofs of these results can be found in [24,23,18,19].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, for fixed k, the Van Vleck zeros are distinct and also lie within (α 1 , α 3 ). The proofs of these results can be found in [24,23,18,19].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The polynomial C(x) is called a Van Vleck polynomial and the corresponding polynomial solution y(x) of (1.1) is called a Stieltjes polynomial. Van Vleck [18] was the first to prove that the zeros of C(x) lie in (a 0 , a p ). Klein [7], Bôcher [2] and Pólya [10] proved that the zeros of Stieltjes polynomials lie in the convex hull of a 0 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above corollary expresses, for y = 0, the results stated in Theorems 1(a) and 1(b) in Marden [6], due, respectively, to Stieltjes [8] and Van Vleck [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For the first time, Marden [6] gave the treatment of (1.1) subject to condition |arga | < y < tt/2 and obtained varied generalizations of the results (cf. Marden [6, Theorems l(a)-2(a)]) established earlier by Stieltjes [8], Van Vleck [9], Bôcher [1], Klein [3], and Pólya [7]. Our object in this paper is to study the zeros of the polynomials S(z) and V(z) in relation to the differential equation (1.2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%