2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the relationship between stature and anthropometric measurements of lumbar vertebrae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It thus seems plausible that vertebral dimensions could yield accurate stature estimates. To test this, several studies have measured the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, sacral and/or coccygeal segments (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) of cadaveric and living individuals of various population groups, and generated regression equations for stature in these populations. Generally, these equations have shown error margins of around 5 cm, which are somewhat higher than those produced by conventional stature estimation methods, but are still apparently useful in cases in which conventional methods are not applicable.…”
Section: Abstract: Stature Estimation L4 Vertebral Dimensions Magmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It thus seems plausible that vertebral dimensions could yield accurate stature estimates. To test this, several studies have measured the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, sacral and/or coccygeal segments (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) of cadaveric and living individuals of various population groups, and generated regression equations for stature in these populations. Generally, these equations have shown error margins of around 5 cm, which are somewhat higher than those produced by conventional stature estimation methods, but are still apparently useful in cases in which conventional methods are not applicable.…”
Section: Abstract: Stature Estimation L4 Vertebral Dimensions Magmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The L4-specific simple models were somewhat less accurate, with errors of 4.7-6.6 cm and 3.7-4.6 cm among men and women, respectively. In another recent study utilizing a sample of 42 Western male cadavers, Klein et al (11) measured various dimensions of L2-L5 (heights, depths, facet tip distance) by means of computed tomography, and reported SEEs of 5.9-6.7 cm. Specific results for L4 were not given as they were not among the most accurate predictors of stature.…”
Section: A C C E P T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have focused on microscopic structures of bones such as the femur, tibia, fibula, iliac crest of the hip in cross-sectional images for age-related bone diseases (Liu et al, 1996;Jatti, 2012) using image processing techniques. Other reports have studied cervical and lumbar vertebrae for estimating sex (Badr EI Dine & El Shafei, 2015; and stature (Klein et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015) in CT and MRI. However, there are no studies on coarse bone anatomy with estimation of sex and stature by image analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post mortem data collection is important and plays a huge role in the process of identifying victims. 7 Y= 67448+3.63 X 1 cm (Male) Y= -29.491+7.228 X 1 cm (Female) Y= 90.813+4.284 X 2 cm (Male) Y= 18.848+8.287 X 2 cm (Female)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%