2017
DOI: 10.1090/tran/6922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the spectral norm of Gaussian random matrices

Abstract: Abstract. Let X be a d × d symmetric random matrix with independent but non-identically distributed Gaussian entries. It has been conjectured by Lata la that the spectral norm of X is always of the same order as the largest Euclidean norm of its rows. A positive resolution of this conjecture would provide a sharp understanding of the probabilistic mechanisms that control the spectral norm of inhomogeneous Gaussian random matrices. This paper establishes the conjecture up to a dimensional factor of order √ log … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us note that, on the face of it, this conclusion is quite striking: it is trivial that the operator norm of a matrix must be large if the matrix possesses a row with large Euclidean norm; what we have shown is that for symmetric Gaussian matrices with independent centered entries, this is the only reason why the operator norm can be large, regardless of the variance pattern of the matrix entries. For some further discussion and a different probabilistic interpretation, see [17]. It turns out that the above probabilistic formulation can be developed in much greater generality.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us note that, on the face of it, this conclusion is quite striking: it is trivial that the operator norm of a matrix must be large if the matrix possesses a row with large Euclidean norm; what we have shown is that for symmetric Gaussian matrices with independent centered entries, this is the only reason why the operator norm can be large, regardless of the variance pattern of the matrix entries. For some further discussion and a different probabilistic interpretation, see [17]. It turns out that the above probabilistic formulation can be developed in much greater generality.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this bound already yields the optimal result that could be obtained for the operator norm by the moment method. In order to surmount this obstacle, the second author developed in [17] an entirely different method to bound the operator norm of nonhomogeneous Gaussian matrices through the geometry of random processes. This approach made it possible to prove the following dimension-free bound, cf.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that even the most trivial of examples from the random matrix perspective, such as the case where X is a diagonal matrix with i.i.d. Gaussian entries on the diagonal, require already a delicate multiscale net to obtain sharp results; see, e.g., [30].…”
Section: Remark 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this is not the case in general; a simple counterexample was found by Seginer [54], see [8,Remark 4.8]. Nevertheless, it is an open conjecture of Latala that Seginer's theorem does hold if M has independent Gaussian entries, see the papers [52,56] and the survey [57].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%