2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Uncertainty of Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
110
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MC dropout has been widely adopted in various research fields. Applications include camera pose estimation (Kendall and Cipolla, 2016), depth estimation (Poggi et al, 2020), pedestrian localization (Bertoni et al, 2019), semantic segmentation (Mukhoti and Gal, 2018), and electrocardiogram signal detection (Elola et al, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MC dropout has been widely adopted in various research fields. Applications include camera pose estimation (Kendall and Cipolla, 2016), depth estimation (Poggi et al, 2020), pedestrian localization (Bertoni et al, 2019), semantic segmentation (Mukhoti and Gal, 2018), and electrocardiogram signal detection (Elola et al, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Johnston et al [47] presented self-attention and discrete disparity prediction to improve the self-supervised monocular trained depth estimation. M. Poggi et al [48] explored for the first time how to estimate the uncertainty for the self-supervised paradigms for monocular depth estimation task and how this effect depth accuracy.…”
Section: Unsupervised Depth Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all of these probabilistic methods, only a unimodal distribution is used to model the aleatoric uncertainty, considering the error distribution as a Gaussian (Kendall and Gal, 2017) or a Laplacian distribution (Poggi et al, 2020;Mehltretter and Heipke, 2021). However, this is not always the case in the context of dense stereo matching, especially in real-world scenarios this assumption is violated by outlier measurements or by commonly challenging regions, such as occlusion, texture-less regions and depth discontinuities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%