2010
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2009.11-08-900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Use of Dynamic Bayesian Networks in Reconstructing Functional Neuronal Networks from Spike Train Ensembles

Abstract: Coordination among cortical neurons is believed to be key element in mediating many high level cortical processes such as perception, attention, learning and memory formation. Inferring the topology of the neural circuitry underlying this coordination is important to characterize the highly non-linear, time-varying interactions between cortical neurons in the presence of complex stimuli. In this work, we investigate the applicability of Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs) in inferring the effective connectivity b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, recent theoretical studies show that an informationgeometric measure could be more directly related to synaptic interactions (Tatsuno and Okada, 2004;Nie and Tatsuno, 2012) and that it can be applied to nonstationary data (Shimazaki et al, 2012). Other promising methods would include a Bayesian approach (Brown et al, 2004;Eldawlatly et al, 2010) and a regularized logistic approach (Zhao et al, 2012). These measures may perform well in identifying causal, nonlinear relationships between neurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, recent theoretical studies show that an informationgeometric measure could be more directly related to synaptic interactions (Tatsuno and Okada, 2004;Nie and Tatsuno, 2012) and that it can be applied to nonstationary data (Shimazaki et al, 2012). Other promising methods would include a Bayesian approach (Brown et al, 2004;Eldawlatly et al, 2010) and a regularized logistic approach (Zhao et al, 2012). These measures may perform well in identifying causal, nonlinear relationships between neurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are techniques that can help identify the functional connectivity of the neural circuitry using available observations. One of the promising approaches is to use Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBN) to infer the effective connectivity from observed spike trains collected using highdensity microelectrode arrays [30].…”
Section: Stimulation Site Selection and Nominal Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past decades have seen the arrival of many methods that can characterize spike timing networks (Abeles and Gerstein, 1988; Chapin and Nicolelis, 1999; Nádasdy et al, 1999; Tetko and Villa, 2001; Grün et al, 2002; Lee and Wilson, 2002; Schnitzer and Meister, 2003; Ikegaya et al, 2004; Okatan et al, 2005; Schneider et al, 2006; Nikolíc, 2007; Pipa et al, 2008; Schrader et al, 2008; Berger et al, 2010; Eldawlatly et al, 2010; Louis et al, 2010; Peyrache et al, 2010; Humphries, 2011; Lopes-dos-Santos et al, 2011; Gansel and Singer, 2012; Torre et al, 2016). Their application has led to important insights, yet they have several limitations, especially when it comes to their application on large scale neuronal recordings (Buzsáki, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, either: (1) the complexity of the identified networks is limited due to combinatorial explosion with increasing network size (e.g., template searching); (2) the networks are described only by the association of their member neurons without describing spike sequences; (3) between-spike time delays >0 are either discarded or not recovered; (4) temporal binning of spike times leads to reduced temporal precision; (5) networks with overlapping member neurons are not separated; or (6) a combination of the above. Although not important for every investigation of interactions in spiking networks (e.g., for higher order interactions see, Nakahara and Amari, 2002; Yu et al, 2009; Eldawlatly et al, 2010; Staude et al, 2010; Balaguer-Ballester et al, 2011; Shimazaki et al, 2012), they are essential for the exact identification of neurons and their spike sequences, and investigating their occurrence as a function of experimental variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%