2016
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2016.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of the Reynolds decomposition in the intermittent region of turbulent boundary layers

Abstract: In the analysis of velocity fields in turbulent boundary layers, the traditional Reynolds decomposition is universally employed to calculate the fluctuating component of streamwise velocity. Here, we demonstrate the perils of such a determination of the fluctuating velocity in the context of structural analysis of turbulence when applied in the outer region where the flow is intermittently turbulent at a given wall distance. A new decomposition is postulated that ensures non-turbulent regions in the flow do no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the applicability of the model is demonstrated for the canonical wall-bounded flows considered here, namely the zero-pressure gradient boundary layer, pipe, and channel flows, and the results are seen to be consistent with known trends for the wake strength between these flows. Finally, we note that our results for internal geometries, where no TNTI is present, are in line with recent findings on internal shear layers in these geometries reported by Kwon et al (2014) and Kwon et al (2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the applicability of the model is demonstrated for the canonical wall-bounded flows considered here, namely the zero-pressure gradient boundary layer, pipe, and channel flows, and the results are seen to be consistent with known trends for the wake strength between these flows. Finally, we note that our results for internal geometries, where no TNTI is present, are in line with recent findings on internal shear layers in these geometries reported by Kwon et al (2014) and Kwon et al (2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Even though the overall agreement of the model with the data is very good, a slight but consistent difference is observed between the model prediction and the data for 0.5 < z/δ < 0.8 in the TBL. As Kwon et al (2016) (see also Kwon 2016) have shown, TNTI oscillations 'contaminate' the fluctuating field in the outer region of wall-bounded flows. By comparing to an alternative decomposition based on averages conditioned on the TNTI position, they demonstrated that the classical Reynolds decomposition leads to slightly higher fluctuation levels where the flow is intermittent.…”
Section: Mean Velocitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We define the streamwise velocity fluctuations , where is the streamwise velocity, and the overbar denotes the ensemble average. For the TBL, the streamwise fluctuating component is decomposed by considering the local height of the turbulent/non-turbulent interface (Kwon, Hutchins & Monty 2016); that is, , where is the conditional mean velocity as a function of and . The profile of shows a significant discrepancy compared with that of in the intermittent region, whereas they collapse close to the wall (Kwon et al.…”
Section: Dns Data and Cluster Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential source of difference between the internal and external flows in figure 9(a,b), may be due to use of Reynolds decomposition in obtaining the u fluctuations. While this is a standard practice, if multiple states with different mean exist in a flow (such as turbulent and nonturbulent regions), all states are reduced to a single common mean (Kwon et al 2016). Hence, the use of Reynolds decomposition can exacerbate observed differences between internal and external flows under outer scaling, as demonstrated by Kwon (2016), who improved the collapse of the two-point correlation of a boundary layer and a channel using an alternate decomposition that separated the turbulent and quiescent core/non-turbulent regions.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Pipe and Boundary Layer Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%