2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-020-03244-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-pot synthesis of dibenzaldehyde-terminated poly(ethylene glycol) for preparation of dynamic chitosan-based amphiphilic hydrogels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To confirm the in situ cross-linking of GC and DP derivatives in the hydrogels, FTIR spectroscopy was used. As shown in Figure D, GC exhibited the characteristic peaks of an amino polysaccharide: CO stretching of acetylamino groups at 1680 cm –1 and N–H bending of amino groups exhibited at 1620 cm –1 , while the absorption peaks at 2887 and 1080 cm –1 are assigned to −CH and −CO groups, respectively. , Meanwhile, it can be observed in the FTIR spectra of the hydrogel groups (GC/DP2, GC/DP4, GC/DP6) that the −NH 2 peak of GC and −CHO peak of DP at ∼1725 cm –1 disappeared, whereas a new peak consequently appeared at 1638 cm –1 corresponding to the occurrence of a reversible Schiff base bond (−CN). ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To confirm the in situ cross-linking of GC and DP derivatives in the hydrogels, FTIR spectroscopy was used. As shown in Figure D, GC exhibited the characteristic peaks of an amino polysaccharide: CO stretching of acetylamino groups at 1680 cm –1 and N–H bending of amino groups exhibited at 1620 cm –1 , while the absorption peaks at 2887 and 1080 cm –1 are assigned to −CH and −CO groups, respectively. , Meanwhile, it can be observed in the FTIR spectra of the hydrogel groups (GC/DP2, GC/DP4, GC/DP6) that the −NH 2 peak of GC and −CHO peak of DP at ∼1725 cm –1 disappeared, whereas a new peak consequently appeared at 1638 cm –1 corresponding to the occurrence of a reversible Schiff base bond (−CN). ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This behavior can be attributed to the higher number of free hydrophilic groups (i.e., −OH, −NH 2 ) present in the polymer chains of both GC and DP, allowing them to hold a significant amount of water molecules within their structure. The swelling degree of the hydrogels was enhanced by the increased molecular weight of DP, having longer chains and a higher number of hydrophilic −OH groups, 29 and lower cross-linking density. 32 Furthermore, as emphasized earlier, the swelling and absorption behavior of hydrogels greatly depends on their porosity which is negatively correlated with cross-linking density.…”
Section: Chemical Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with O-CMC, a broader endothermic peak with a much lower Δ H m value was present in the thermograms of O-CMC–PEG films, indicating a reduced crystallinity. When the PEG linker was introduced into O-CMC, the formed crosslinked structure restricted the chain motion and hindered the formation of crystalline domains 46 . Although the system was deemed partially miscible with immiscibility occurring in the amorphous phase 47 , it was noteworthy that the O-CMC–PEG −6% film exhibited the lowest Δ H m among the four samples, demonstrating superior component compatibility between O-CMC and PEG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new peak appeared at 1640 cm –1 , attributed to the imine bond (−CN) formed by the Schiff base reaction (Figure S1). In addition to the covalent cross-linking of gelatin chains and MD copolymers, the engineered Gel-MD hydrogel may also exhibit noncovalent interactions, including π–π stacking, π–cation, hydrogen bonding (H-bonding), and electrostatic interactions (Figure d). Combinations of these physical and chemical interactions have been previously demonstrated to play a significant role in enhancing the stability and mechanical properties of the resulting gelatin-based hydrogels. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%