2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Feedback Control for Driver-Vehicle Interaction in Automated Driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed system consists of elements such as sensors embedded in the car, an adaptive inference engine that analyzes the driver-vehicle interaction, and an advanced digital platform in the vehicle cabin, which accesses the data obtained from this interaction. Dargahi Nobari et al [111] propose a control scheme with feedback that considers the state of the driver as an input element for the system that analyzes the driver-vehicle interaction. Sensors (e.g., eye-tracker, physiological sensors) are used to detect the state of the driver.…”
Section: Actual Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed system consists of elements such as sensors embedded in the car, an adaptive inference engine that analyzes the driver-vehicle interaction, and an advanced digital platform in the vehicle cabin, which accesses the data obtained from this interaction. Dargahi Nobari et al [111] propose a control scheme with feedback that considers the state of the driver as an input element for the system that analyzes the driver-vehicle interaction. Sensors (e.g., eye-tracker, physiological sensors) are used to detect the state of the driver.…”
Section: Actual Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike unexpected, non-scheduled takeovers (e.g., emergency brake of a lead vehicle in congestion) in which drivers must respond within a short time window, the takeover events due to ODD exit such as exiting a freeway can be scheduled ahead of time rendering drivers ample time to perform a takeover task (McCall et al, 2019). Previous empirical studies adopted a ToR lead time ranging from 6 to 60 seconds (s) for freeway exiting takeovers (Holländer & Pfleging, 2018; Nobari et al, 2020; Petermeijer et al, 2017; Tan & Zhang, 2022; Wörle et al, 2020; Yun & Yang, 2020). These studies were mostly focused on takeover performance (such as takeover response time and vehicle control) and subjective experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%