2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-011-9251-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontologies versus relational databases: are they so different? A comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mapping approach separates transactional and domain perspectives (cf. [61]), in other words, while exploiting ontologies for data access and reasoning, one can continue to use legacy relational data sources in their original form, without migrating or transforming any data, and enjoy the benefits of well established query optimisation and evaluation support available for traditional database management systems. In order to aid ontology and mapping development, a bootstrapping component (cf.…”
Section: Motivating Scenario: Optiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mapping approach separates transactional and domain perspectives (cf. [61]), in other words, while exploiting ontologies for data access and reasoning, one can continue to use legacy relational data sources in their original form, without migrating or transforming any data, and enjoy the benefits of well established query optimisation and evaluation support available for traditional database management systems. In order to aid ontology and mapping development, a bootstrapping component (cf.…”
Section: Motivating Scenario: Optiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the data contained in a knowledge resource can heavily depend on the strategy employed for the data representation [32]. Databases ensure certain levels of data quality by enforcing integrity constraints, but it is not possible to directly codify domain knowledge in them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Museum of the Person as a case-study, we illustrate how elements (or data item) can be found in the annotated documents to instantiate the ontology triples with concepts (the triple's subject and object) and relations (the triple's predicate). Although the triple storage is the most natural way to store the instances, our population method does not change if a relational database is used as archival (for a detailed and interesting comparison about both approaches see (Cruz et al, 2012)). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%