2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontology-Based Controlled Natural Language Editor Using CFG with Lexical Dependency

Abstract: In recent years, CNL (Controlled Natural Language) has received much attention with regard to ontology-based knowledge acquisition systems. CNLs, as subsets of natural languages, can be useful for both humans and computers by eliminating ambiguity of natural languages. Our previous work, OntoPath [10], proposed to edit natural language-like narratives that are structured in RDF (Resource Description Framework) triples, using a domainspecific ontology as their language constituents. However, our previous work a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a larger sample size was chosen and more controls for bias were implemented. All evaluation material and data are available online for inspection, including the CLOnE evaluation results for comparison 16 . The evaluation contained the following:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, a larger sample size was chosen and more controls for bias were implemented. All evaluation material and data are available online for inspection, including the CLOnE evaluation results for comparison 16 . The evaluation contained the following:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, GINO was not compared to any existing Ontology editor during the evaluation. Finally, [16] present an Ontology based Controlled Natural Language Editor, similar to GINO, which uses CFG(Context-free grammar) and lexical dependencies -CFG-DL to generate RDF triples. To our knowledge the system ports only to RDF and does not cater for other Ontology languages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, after running the Sesame, locally or in a server, we are ready to upload our data, as .N3 format. [8], [9], [10] In this way a successful upload guarantee that our data are stored and ready for consuming by other people. For this purpose we are offering a SPARQL endpoint as one of the best practices for consuming the data.…”
Section: Storing Rdf Triplesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At the moment there is a relatively large list of choices for this purpose, where each of them has its advantages and disadvantages. Among these, the most know tools are AllegroGraph 7 , OpenLink Virtuoso 8 , Sesame 9 , 4store 10 , etc. For some practical reasons, in this project our choice has been Sesame, which includes parsing, storing, inferencing and querying such data.…”
Section: Storing Rdf Triplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several platforms have been developed to function as either natural language ontology editors or natural language query systems. Two good examples in the first category are CNL Editor [ 34 ] (formerly OntoPath [ 35 ]) and GINO [ 36 ]. OntoPath is in fact situated in the frontier between these two categories because it manages and creates RDF ontologies, and it is also capable of defining queries from natural language sentences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%