2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.746625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OPC verification on cell level using fully rigorous mask topography simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using Eq. (13) and assuming the FWHM of EUV light source about 0.8 nm, the light intensity versus wavelength for the incident EUV light is plotted as the red line in Fig. 8.…”
Section: Full 3-d Simulation Of Patterned Euv Maskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using Eq. (13) and assuming the FWHM of EUV light source about 0.8 nm, the light intensity versus wavelength for the incident EUV light is plotted as the red line in Fig. 8.…”
Section: Full 3-d Simulation Of Patterned Euv Maskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FDTD and FEM can be used to simulate the complex 3-D structures, and these two methods have recently been used in EUV mask simulation. [13][14][15] The memory requirement and computation time consumption of the FDTD simulation mostly depend on the mesh numbers used in computation domain, which vary with mesh size, wavelength, and the simulated structure complexity. More accurate results can be obtained by using finer meshes in FDTD computation, but a long computation time and a huge amount of memory result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform the simulations, we used two lithography simulation software packages, namely, Sentaurus Lithography (S-Litho) from Synopsys and EM-SUITE from Panoramic Technology Inc. EM-Suite was used to perform simulations implementing the FDTD algorithm 19,20 while S-Litho was used to perform simulations implementing the FDTD as well as the waveguide algorithms 21 for the rigorous modeling of EUV masks. The optical and imaging parameters used for the simulations were chosen to match the parameters used for the AIT imaging, which were 13.5 nm wavelength radiation incident on the mask at an angle of 6 degrees, disk-fill illumination with a r value of 0.2, and a mask-side numerical aperture of 0.0875 (0.35, 4Â wafer-side).…”
Section: B Comparing the Simulation And Ait Through-focus Aerial Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%