Proceedings of the Workshop on Human-Computer Question Answering 2016
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w16-0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open-domain Factoid Question Answering via Knowledge Graph Search

Abstract: We introduce a highly scalable approach for open-domain question answering with no dependence on any data set for surface form to logical form mapping or any linguistic analytic tool such as POS tagger or named entity recognizer. We define our approach under the Constrained Conditional Models framework which lets us scale up to a full knowledge graph with no limitation on the size. On a standard benchmark, we obtained near 4 percent improvement over the state-of-the-art in open-domain question answering task.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, QA has been largely benefited from the development of Deep Neural Network (DNN) architectures largely in the form of Convolution Neural Networks (CNN) (LeCun et al, 1998) or Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) (Elman, 1990). QA systems based on semantic parsing (Clarke et al, 2010;Kwiatkowski et al, 2010), IR-based systems (Yao and Durme, 2014), cloze-type (Kadlec et al, 2016;Hermann et al, 2015), factoid (Aghaebrahimian and Jurčíček, 2016b; and non-factoid systems (Aghaebrahimian, 2017a;Rajpurkar et al, 2016) are some of the QA variants that have been improved by DNNs. Among all of these varieties, factoid and non-factoid are two most widely studied branches of QA systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, QA has been largely benefited from the development of Deep Neural Network (DNN) architectures largely in the form of Convolution Neural Networks (CNN) (LeCun et al, 1998) or Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) (Elman, 1990). QA systems based on semantic parsing (Clarke et al, 2010;Kwiatkowski et al, 2010), IR-based systems (Yao and Durme, 2014), cloze-type (Kadlec et al, 2016;Hermann et al, 2015), factoid (Aghaebrahimian and Jurčíček, 2016b; and non-factoid systems (Aghaebrahimian, 2017a;Rajpurkar et al, 2016) are some of the QA variants that have been improved by DNNs. Among all of these varieties, factoid and non-factoid are two most widely studied branches of QA systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We look up the extracted fragments in Wikidata by comparing them to labels of the Wikidata items. Following the approach in [1], we sort the retrieved list of items by the combination of the Levenshtein distance between the fragment and the item label and the integer part of the item ID. We select the top candidate for each fragment as the final linking.…”
Section: Entity Linkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tokenize the relation labels and use them as input to the same CNN-based encoder to produce a semantic vector for each relation. 1 To get a single vector for the whole representation, we apply another max pooling operation on the set of the relation vectors. The final semantic vector for a candidate representation encodes the most prominent features of the relations that it contains.…”
Section: Iterative Representation Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process requires detailed knowledge to establish a high coverage and e cient question answering system [5,6]. In such systems, multiple knowledge formats from a large variety of natural language sources, such as textbooks, encyclopedias, newspapers, and literary works, have to be processed to provide a knowledge base [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%