ICASSP 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icassp40776.2020.9053937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opendenoising: An Extensible Benchmark for Building Comparative Studies of Image Denoisers

Abstract: Image denoising has recently taken a leap forward due to machine learning. However, image denoisers, both expert-based and learning-based, are mostly tested on well-behaved generated noises (usually Gaussian) rather than on real-life noises, making performance comparisons difficult in real-world conditions. This is especially true for learning-based denoisers which performance depends on training data. Hence, choosing which method to use for a specific denoising problem is difficult.This paper proposes a compa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is composed of a combination of Poisson noise, Gaussian noise, and Bernoulli noise. In [20], authors compare methods designed for AWGN removal when trained and evaluated on more complex noises such as sequential mixtures of Gaussian and Bernoulli distributions. Experimental results show that denoising performances severely drop on complex noises even when using supervised learning methods like Denoising Convolutional Neural Network (DnCNN).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is composed of a combination of Poisson noise, Gaussian noise, and Bernoulli noise. In [20], authors compare methods designed for AWGN removal when trained and evaluated on more complex noises such as sequential mixtures of Gaussian and Bernoulli distributions. Experimental results show that denoising performances severely drop on complex noises even when using supervised learning methods like Denoising Convolutional Neural Network (DnCNN).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each class, several state of the art denoising architectures have been compared to be used as primary denoisers. The comparison was done using the OpenDenoising benchmark tool [20]. The compared methods are Multi-level Wavelet Convolutionnal Neural Network (MWCNN) [6], Self-Guided Network (SGN) [15], Super-Resolution Residual Network (SRResNet) [13] and DnCNN [5].…”
Section: B Gradual Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driven by the availability of large datasets, rapid increases in computational power and, advances in algorithmic development for optimization of neural networks, deep learning has made impressive improvements in tackling many computer vision tasks [15][16][17][18]. In the context of image denoising, deep learning has attracted significant research interest and raised many new questions during the past recent years [2,[19][20][21] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, different denoising paradigms have been proposed during the past years, however, most of these methods are tailored to specific contexts and are based on benchmark datasets that are not directly comparable. Additionally, some new benchmark datasets have been proposed which are not included in the existing reviews [2,[19][20][21]. This motivates us to examine the recent advances in this active area to deliver an overview as well as new perspectives for interesting research directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%