2020
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2019.2953277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunistic Cooperative Transmission for Underwater Communication Based on the Water’s Key Physical Variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e steering matrix G of dimension W × D comprises the time delay entities of signals for each hydrophone. Here, v(t) is additive white Gaussian noise of zero mean with a dimension of W × 1. e covariance matrix [27,28] is defined as…”
Section: Z(t) � G(θ)y(t) + V(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e steering matrix G of dimension W × D comprises the time delay entities of signals for each hydrophone. Here, v(t) is additive white Gaussian noise of zero mean with a dimension of W × 1. e covariance matrix [27,28] is defined as…”
Section: Z(t) � G(θ)y(t) + V(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the system utilized a finite number of transmission modes which were switched based on the effective signal-to-noise ratio (ESNR). Different modulation methods were used in Reference [ 10 ] for opportunistic cooperative transmission of underwater networks under various environmental conditions to achieve the best compromise between robustness and data rate. Kuai et al [ 11 ] proposed a fixed threshold adaption algorithm and the required SNR of different modulation methods were presented to meet the target bit error rate (BER).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, adaptive transmission according to channel state has become a hot topic. The rule-based adaptive modulation and coding (AMC) methods usually utilize fixed thresholds for transmission mode determination [ 1 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. These methods are easy for implementation and could be used in the resource-constrained networks, while the threshold selection should be carefully designed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An acoustic-based underwater communication has many drawbacks such as high latency, low data rates, and high attenuation. The situation was not much different when using RF in underwater communication scenarios [1,2]. An acoustic-based underwater communication has many drawbacks such as high latency, low data rates, high bit error rates, and high attenuation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%