Opportunistic Routing in Presence of Selfish Nodes for MANET

Thorat, Sandeep A.; Kulkarni, Prakash Jayanth

doi:10.1007/s11277-014-2247-4

Cited by 16 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since the OR protocols use the OR metrics, to avoid unnecessary literature searching, Table V lists the OR metrics with several OR protocol deployments alongside their paper references. Routing Metric Protocol EXOR [39], Economy [59], SOAR [41], MORE [27], CodeOR [66], XCOR [67] ETX O3 [206], SlideOR [207], CCACK [65], OMNC [208], Consort [58], MaxOPP [209], ORPL [210], CAOR [211], TORP [212], ORPSN [213], CAR [214], CORMAN [48] ExOR compact [215], NCOR [216], WBFL [217], E-MORE [218], ViMOR [219] EAX LCAR [47], OAPF [111] , ORDF [220]…”

Section: Or Metrics: a Quick Referencementioning

confidence: 99%

Opportunistic routing metrics: A timely one-stop tutorial survey

Abdollahi

Eshghi

Kelarestaghi

et al. 2020

Journal of Network and Computer Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

High-speed, low latency, and heterogeneity features of 5G, as the common denominator of many emerging and classic wireless applications, have put wireless technology back in the spotlight. Continuous connectivity requirement in low-power and wide-reach networks underlines the need for more efficient routing over scarce wireless resources, in multi-hp scenarios. In this regard, Opportunistic Routing (OR), which utilizes the broadcast nature of wireless media to provide transmission cooperation amongst a selected number of overhearing nodes, has become more promising than ever. Crucial to the overall network performance, which nodes to participate and where they stand on the transmission-priority hierarchy, are decided by userdefined OR metrics embedded in OR protocols. Therefore, the task of choosing or designing an appropriate OR metric is a critical one. The numerousness, proprietary notations, and the objective variousness of OR metrics can cause the interested researcher to lose insight and become overwhelmed, making the metric selection or design effort-intensive. While there are not any comprehensive OR metrics surveys in the literature, those who partially address the subject are non-exhaustive and lacking in detail. Furthermore, they offer limited insight regarding related taxonomy and future research recommendations. In this paper, starting with a custom tutorial with a new look to OR and OR metrics, we devise a new framework for OR metric design. Introducing a new taxonomy enables us to take a structured, investigative, and comparative approach to OR metrics, supported by extensive simulations. Exhaustive coverage of OR metrics, formulated in a unified notation, is presented with sufficient details. Self-explanatory, easy-to-grasp, and visual-friendly quick references are provided, which can be used independently from the rest of the paper. Finally, a new insightful framework for future research directions is developed. This tutorial-survey has been organized to benefit both generalists and OR specialists equally, and to be used not only in its entirety but selectively as well.

show abstract

Section: Or Metrics: a Quick Referencementioning

confidence: 99%

Opportunistic routing metrics: A timely one-stop tutorial survey

Abdollahi

Eshghi

Kelarestaghi

et al. 2020

Journal of Network and Computer Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Two protocols AODV and DSR are compared using node density and node mobility parameter under random waypoint model and random waypoint with attractions. Sandeep et al [21] proposed opportunistic routing protocol to maintain smooth network performance in presence of selfish nodes. It is observed that opportunistic routing protocol helps to improve PDR in presence of selfish nodes.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating MANET Uncertainty Analysis Framework

Pawar¹,

Thorat²,

Kshirsagar³

2018

2018 11th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The route discovery is essential when the multi hops are required in the MANET for data transmission [9,10]. Routing is considered as an essential operation in the MANET and this routing is challenging task due to the dynamic links, and broadcast nature of the communication and lack of infrastructure [11]. In addition, the restricted mobility energy capacity creates the link and node failure in network [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

PUSR: Position Update Secure Routing protocol for MANET

Anantapur¹,

Venkanagouda²

2021

IJIES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobile ad hoc network is a self-organizing wireless network, which is formed by the wireless mobile devices without any centralized infrastructure. The mobile nodes in the network are mainly affected by the inherent characteristics such as unpredictable network topology and open wireless medium. Especially, the presence of selfish nodes in the network creates the packet loss and affects an entire communication system. In this paper, the hash function with position updating algorithm is proposed in the Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing protocol for improving the security against the selfish nodes. The AODV routing protocol is used to transmit the data packets from the source to the destination. Therefore, the Prevention of Selfish Node using Hash Function (PSNHF) with position update algorithm is proposed for minimizing the packet loss through the network. The performances of proposed AODV-PSNHF method are analysed in terms of energy consumption, throughput, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), packet loss and normalized routing load. In addition, the AODV-PSNHF method is compared with the existing trust-aware ad-hoc routing protocol (T2AR). The selfish node identification using hash function and positioning update using AODV-PSNHF method provides reliable and secure data transmission under selfish nodes and shows better performance in terms of throughput, packet delivery ratio and packet loss. For 2% of malicious nodes the PDR of the AODV-PSNHF method is 89%, it is 9% higher when compared to the T2AR protocol whose PDR% is only 80% for the same.

show abstract

Opportunistic Routing in Presence of Selfish Nodes for MANET

Cited by 16 publications

References 30 publications

Opportunistic routing metrics: A timely one-stop tutorial survey

Opportunistic routing metrics: A timely one-stop tutorial survey

Evaluating MANET Uncertainty Analysis Framework

PUSR: Position Update Secure Routing protocol for MANET

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About