Opposing views: associations of political polarization, political party affiliation, and social trust with COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt

Abstract

Introduction Political polarization has increased in the USA within recent years. Studies have shown Republicans are less likely to accept COVID-19 vaccinations than Democrats; however, little is known regarding the association between COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and political polarization. Methods We used data from a nationally-representative survey of 1427 participants conducted between 9 February 2021 and 17 February 2021. We estimated multivariate-adjusted odds ratios for COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt according to perceived political polarization (measured as the perceived size of the ideological gap between Democrats and Republicans), political party affiliation, and social trust, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic factors. Results Among participants perceiving high levels of polarization, Republicans (versus Democrats) reported a 90% lower odds of vaccination intent (OR = 0.10 [0.05, 0.19], P < 0.001). Participants with high (versus low) social trust and low perceived polarization had a 2-folder higher vaccination intent (OR = 2.39 [1.34, 4.21], P = 0.003); this association was substantially weaker in the high perceived polarization group. Conclusions High perceived levels of political polarization appear to magnify the decrease in the odds of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine and the intent to get vaccinated among Republicans versus Democrats. Political polarization may further attenuate the protective associations of high social capital with vaccination.

An Analysis of Factors Shaping Vaccine Attitudes and Behaviours in a Low-Trust Society Based on Structural Equation Modelling—The Case of Poland’s Vaccination Programme against COVID-19

“…Moreover, Brazil is also a country where trust in the government is low [ 9 ]. A link between partisan polarisation and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination has also been found in the United States [ 81 ], where trust in the government has been historically low for more than 60 years.…”

The harmful effects of partisan polarization on health

“…After all, one is not polarized alone; stemming polarization requires population and community-level efforts. On top of this, the COVID-19 crisis has deepened political divides in many communities over masking, vaccination, and testing protocols ( 72 ). Some scholars have begun developing and testing toolkits for bridging divided communities ( 73–75 ).…”

Leveraging Natural Language Processing and Geospatial Time Series Model to Analyze COVID-19 Vaccination Sentiment Dynamics from Tweets

“…[30] Political polarization, as well as libertarian views and alternative health care advocacy, triggered public questioning about the importance, safety, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines. [31] In addition, manufacturing delays also increased the negative sentiment toward vaccination. [32] For example, in February 2021, vaccine distribution was disrupted in several states, including Texas, Missouri, Alabama, and New Hampshire due to severe winter storms.…”