1982
DOI: 10.1116/1.571704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical and field effect studies of the Hg0.7Cd0.3 Te–anodic oxide interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the analysis of R H (B) one can determine the carrier parameters in n-type layer induced near the interface. The typical values of areal electron density are 5.0⋅10 11 ÷1.1⋅10 12 cm 2 and their mobility is within 18 00022 000 cm 2 /(V⋅s) that is in a good agreement with data obtained before [1,2,10,11]. It was also determined that anodization of p-type samples followed by removing AO does not affect the Hall coefficient field dependence.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the analysis of R H (B) one can determine the carrier parameters in n-type layer induced near the interface. The typical values of areal electron density are 5.0⋅10 11 ÷1.1⋅10 12 cm 2 and their mobility is within 18 00022 000 cm 2 /(V⋅s) that is in a good agreement with data obtained before [1,2,10,11]. It was also determined that anodization of p-type samples followed by removing AO does not affect the Hall coefficient field dependence.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, within the AO-MCT interface model developed in [3,11] the following factors are supposed to be responsible for overall changes in samples caused by LSW: an increased potential barrier that prevents the elemental mercury from interface-to-semiconductor moving; the elemental mercury removed from an interface into an oxide volume and replaced with HgTe-based complexes; the AO-MCT interface rebuilding, which decreases the free mercury concentration. Additionally, elemental mercury and tellurium may probably form HgTe complexes at the interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] These native films can provide an effective solution to the problem of passivation of ntype material since the anodic process consumes the MCT substrate in a controlled manner thus removing any surface damage leading to a sharp MCT/dielectric interface. 19,20 The electronic and optical properties [21][22][23][24] as well as the photoelectrochemical 25 response of the anodic oxide have also been examined. 9,10 The formation of the anodic oxide is by far the most extensively studied system with thorough investigations of the composition, 11 growth mechanisms [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and thermal properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integrated dark current and effective well capacity as functions of total dose are shown in Figures 8 and 9 Several other studies have shown there to be a high density of traps at this interface also [17]. The linear dose dependence of the flatband shift indicates that saturation of the empty traps has not occurred at the maximum dose of 3x104 rad(ZnS).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%