2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21195-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Binding Phenomena: Observations and Mechanisms

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source• a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses• the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. forming time-evolution s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 6) or of Eq. ( 11) did not affect the final drop deformation (equal to 0.132) when the MPLIC scheme and ϕ w1 =174.3 V were used, in accordance with Taylor (2011), where it is stated that the electrostrictive force does not affect the incompressible droplet shape. The obtained final drop deformation did not change even in cases in which either of the parameters c els1 or c els2 was set to be equal to 1.5 (this value was used previously in Shneider and Pekker (2013)).…”
Section: Electrostrictive Forcementioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( 6) or of Eq. ( 11) did not affect the final drop deformation (equal to 0.132) when the MPLIC scheme and ϕ w1 =174.3 V were used, in accordance with Taylor (2011), where it is stated that the electrostrictive force does not affect the incompressible droplet shape. The obtained final drop deformation did not change even in cases in which either of the parameters c els1 or c els2 was set to be equal to 1.5 (this value was used previously in Shneider and Pekker (2013)).…”
Section: Electrostrictive Forcementioning
confidence: 62%
“…Based on the comparison of Eqs. ( 26) and ( 5), and the statement in Taylor (2011) that the electrostrictive force is exactly balanced by a pressure increase in the incompressible drop, it could be expected that inclusion of an expression for the electrostrictive force would result just in a pressure increase. Axially symmetric geometries, as in Figure 2, were made.…”
Section: Drop Deformation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of TiO 2 microspheres suitable for scattering light over the entire visible range was calculated using Mie scattering theory, which predicts the effective electric and/or magnetic polarizability densities of scattering objects. 19,20 Light scattering by a spherical particle much smaller than the incident light wavelength can be accurately determined by the Mie solution. The scattered eld of a single dielectric sphere with radius r 0 and relative refractive index n can be decomposed into a multipole series.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, those methods rely on either high field intensities or specific particles' materials, which may limit their generality. Increasing optical trap stiffness without a need to use high-intensity illumination, flexible control over interparticle distances as well as anisotropic optical binding in different directions are among the long-standing challenges, valuable from both fundamental and practical standpoints 33 . Parameters of optical binding can be significantly influenced by introducing a nearby interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing optical trap stiffness without a need to use high-intensity illumination, flexible control over interparticle distances, and anisotropic optical binding in different directions are among the long-standing challenges, valuable from both fundamental and practical standpoints. 33 Parameters of optical binding can be significantly influenced by introducing a nearby interface. It modifies both the incident field due to Fresnel reflection and effective particle polarizabilities owing to nearfield interactions, qualitatively understood with the help of the image theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%