1985
DOI: 10.1016/0167-9317(85)90048-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical lithography simulation: Introduction to SPESA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complete fundamental knowledge of the physical relation among the photolithography variables is not yet available. There do exist photolithography models that attempt to cope with the multidimensional nature of the process, such as those implemented in the programs SAMPLE (Oldham et al, 1979), PROLITH (Mack, 1985), PROSIM (Garza and Grindle, 1986), and SPESA (Bernard, 1985). Although these models provide quantitative process descriptions useful for the purpose of comparing alternative processing procedures and for analyzing process trends, they are too extensive for on-line production control.…”
Section: Reduced-order Photolithography Model For Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete fundamental knowledge of the physical relation among the photolithography variables is not yet available. There do exist photolithography models that attempt to cope with the multidimensional nature of the process, such as those implemented in the programs SAMPLE (Oldham et al, 1979), PROLITH (Mack, 1985), PROSIM (Garza and Grindle, 1986), and SPESA (Bernard, 1985). Although these models provide quantitative process descriptions useful for the purpose of comparing alternative processing procedures and for analyzing process trends, they are too extensive for on-line production control.…”
Section: Reduced-order Photolithography Model For Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%