2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21144681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Simulation and Experimental Assessment with Time–Walk Correction of TOF–PET Detectors with Multi-Ended Readouts

Abstract: As a commonly used solution, the multi-ended readout can measure the depth-of-interaction (DOI) for positron emission tomography (PET) detectors. In the present study, the effects of the multi-ended readout design were investigated using the leading-edge discriminator (LED) triggers on the timing performance of time-of-flight (TOF) PET detectors. At the very first, the photon transmission model of the four detectors, namely, single-ended readout, dual-ended readout, side dual-ended readout, and triple-ended re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, they have gained attention [20], [21] as they provide high SR [22], [23], [24] but also offer intrinsic depth of interaction (DOI) capabilities [25], [26], thus reducing parallax errors at reduced costs compared to segmented topologies. While, for example, the γ-positioning strongly profits from the spread detection information, it creates disadvantages for the timing performance due to an enhancement of timewalk effects [27], [28], [29] and jitter in signal-propagation times [30], [31], which deteriorate CTR. Therefore, monolithic detector concepts demand advanced readout algorithms and calibration routines to infer the needed information from the detected optical information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, they have gained attention [20], [21] as they provide high SR [22], [23], [24] but also offer intrinsic depth of interaction (DOI) capabilities [25], [26], thus reducing parallax errors at reduced costs compared to segmented topologies. While, for example, the γ-positioning strongly profits from the spread detection information, it creates disadvantages for the timing performance due to an enhancement of timewalk effects [27], [28], [29] and jitter in signal-propagation times [30], [31], which deteriorate CTR. Therefore, monolithic detector concepts demand advanced readout algorithms and calibration routines to infer the needed information from the detected optical information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, they have gained attention [15,16] as they provide high spatial resolution [17][18][19] but also offer intrinsic depth of interaction (DOI) capabilities [20,21] at reduced costs compared to segmented topologies, reducing parallax errors. While, e.g., the γ-positioning strongly profits from the spread detection information, it creates disadvantages for the timing performance due to an enhancement of timewalk effects [22][23][24] and jitter in signal-propagation times [25,26], which deteriorate CTR. Therefore, monolithic detector concepts demand advanced readout algorithms and calibration routines to infer the needed information from the detected optical information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%