2008
DOI: 10.1117/12.777205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical through-focus technique that differentiates small changes in line width, line height, and sidewall angle for CD, overlay, and defect metrology applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The polarization state of the illumination produces different sensitivities for a given dimensional difference. This is illustrated in Reference [8] for an isolated line at λ = 193 nm and 100 nm nominal line height and linewidth for unpolarized, TE-polarized (electric field pointing along the lines), and TM-polarized (electric field pointing perpendicular to the lines) illumination. The results show a large difference in the MSD values (i.e., sensitivity) depending on the illumination polarization for a 2.0 nm difference in the line height.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The polarization state of the illumination produces different sensitivities for a given dimensional difference. This is illustrated in Reference [8] for an isolated line at λ = 193 nm and 100 nm nominal line height and linewidth for unpolarized, TE-polarized (electric field pointing along the lines), and TM-polarized (electric field pointing perpendicular to the lines) illumination. The results show a large difference in the MSD values (i.e., sensitivity) depending on the illumination polarization for a 2.0 nm difference in the line height.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Under the given simulation conditions, the TM polarization produced the maximum sensitivity, about 10 times the sensitivity of unpolarized light. Similarly one can optimize the experimental conditions, such as illumination numerical aperture or collection numerical aperture, to produce a maximum sensitivity [8].…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many alternative methods have been developed to overcome this limitation, such as scatterometry, confocal microscopy, etc. [1][2][3][4][5] Recently, scatterfield microscopy has demonstrated a potential for improving optical measurement sensitivity and performance. [3][4][5] Scatterfield microscopy combines scatterometry and bright-field optical microscopy, and features Köhler illumination so that an off-axis point in the back focal plane (BFP) of an objective lens makes a plane wave illuminating the sample plane at a specific angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through-focus scanning optical microscopy (TSOM) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] allows conventional optical microscopes to collect dimensional information by combining 2D optical images captured at several through-focus positions, transforming a conventional optical microscope into a 3D metrology tool. TSOM is not a resolution enhancement method but an image comparison method and has been demonstrated through simulations to provide lateral and vertical measurement sensitivity of less than a n anometer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%