1984
DOI: 10.2307/258446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal and Dysfunctional Turnover: Toward an Organizational Level Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
185
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
185
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turnover in itself is not necessarily detrimental to an organization as the exit of underperforming employees can be beneficial (Abelson & Baysinger, 1984;McElroy, Morrow, & Rude, 2001). In general, however, turnover has been shown to have a negative effect on organizational performance (Hancock, Allen, Bosco, McDaniel, & Pierce, 2013;Park & Shaw, 2013).…”
Section: Voluntary Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turnover in itself is not necessarily detrimental to an organization as the exit of underperforming employees can be beneficial (Abelson & Baysinger, 1984;McElroy, Morrow, & Rude, 2001). In general, however, turnover has been shown to have a negative effect on organizational performance (Hancock, Allen, Bosco, McDaniel, & Pierce, 2013;Park & Shaw, 2013).…”
Section: Voluntary Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vacancies they create with their departure from the organization are replaced with new employees who bring fresh knowledge, new ideas and creativity [1], [25].…”
Section: The Emergence and Importance Of Turnover For The Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies indicate that staff turnover is the main cause of the loss of institutional memory (Mason and Pauleen, 2003) as well as loss of organization level tacit knowledge (Stovel and Bontis, 2002). Conversely, other research findings show that employee turnover sometimes reduces stagnation and improves innovation (Abelson and Baysinger, 1984) while separating poor performers (Dalton and Todor, 1979). The average number of developers who received training in project management was 5.21 developers per firm while 6.39 developers could translate customer needs into programming.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%