1986
DOI: 10.1109/taes.1986.310699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Data Fusion in Multiple Sensor Detection Systems

Abstract: on in my paper [2], and referred to in the preceding correspondence, is the following. The transmitted waveform is a sequence of M distinct signals, spaced sufficiently far apart that the echos from adjacent signals do not significantly overlap. Each of the M signals is itself a coded sequence of N elemental pulses, each of duration To. The echos from each of the M signals are

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
505
0
16

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,009 publications
(524 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
505
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…i.e., the posterior probability of the combined classifier is the average posterior probability of the single stream classifiers (Chair and Varshney, 1986). In our case, only some of the single stream classifiers are statistical and produce posterior probabilities, namely, salient lexical and context information classifiers, as can be seen in Eqs.…”
Section: Fusion Of Acoustic Lexical and Contextual Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i.e., the posterior probability of the combined classifier is the average posterior probability of the single stream classifiers (Chair and Varshney, 1986). In our case, only some of the single stream classifiers are statistical and produce posterior probabilities, namely, salient lexical and context information classifiers, as can be seen in Eqs.…”
Section: Fusion Of Acoustic Lexical and Contextual Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network aims to minimize the probability of error or some other cost function at the fusion center, by choosing optimal transmission functions and fusion rules. Various properties and variants of the decentralized detection problem in a parallel configuration have been extensively studied over the last twenty-five years; examples include the following: [4][5][6][7][8] study the properties of optimal fusion rules and quantizers at sensor nodes; [9] shows the existence of optimal strategies, and proves that likelihood ratio quantizers are optimal for a large class of problems including the decentralized detection problem; and [10][11][12][13][14] consider constrained decentralized detection. The reader is referred to [15,16] for a survey of the work done in this area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using and , we estimate (where is in word and is the corresponding phoneme from the phone recognizer) and . Using Bayes theorem, we find and Hence, a correct/incorrect likelihood ratio for the co-occurrence of a pair of phones and corresponding to the word can be defined (8) (Note that a similar approach of using a likelihood ratio based on a cross-confusion matrix was taken in [12].) Again assuming independence of terms, a confidence measure for word is then (9) where is estimated as the logarithm of the ratio of correct words to incorrect words.…”
Section: A Alignment and Comparison Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%