2019
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2870058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Design for Distributed Secondary Voltage Control in Islanded Microgrids: Communication Topology and Controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The distributed control typically requires each control unit to exchange information with its neighbors, the communication requirements varying from sending and receiving measurements (e.g. active/reactive power, voltage, and frequency) to and from all direct neighbors [43], to optimized solutions that reduce the communication burden to only selected neighbors [37].…”
Section: B Secondary Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distributed control typically requires each control unit to exchange information with its neighbors, the communication requirements varying from sending and receiving measurements (e.g. active/reactive power, voltage, and frequency) to and from all direct neighbors [43], to optimized solutions that reduce the communication burden to only selected neighbors [37].…”
Section: B Secondary Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the fast nature of MG secondary control makes them more prone to communication weaknesses compared to conventional secondary controls on larger power systems. Several recent works have assessed the robustness of MGs secondary control methods against time delays [56][57][58][59][60], using random modelling of the delays for centralized control [56] or Markov chains modelling of the delays for distributed secondary control [57]. Most of these studies focus on frequency and voltage regulation controllers, however optimal energy management controls on the secondary levels can be also affected by communication delays [58].…”
Section: Secondary Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robustness and limitations of such controls against communication issues need to be more thoroughly addressed in the future. A multi-objective optimization criterion is proposed for the optimization of communication network design, taking into consideration the secondary control convergence performance, network-relevant time delays, and communication network costs [60].…”
Section: Secondary Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K I represents the integral coefficient, and C represents the bias factor, which is related to the mismatch degree of voltage and reactive power sharing [19]. The modified reference value of droop voltage under cooperative secondary control is shown as (8), which is equivalent to shifting the voltage droop control curve:…”
Section: Cooperative Secondary Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where I K represents the integral coefficient, and C represents the bias factor, which is related to the mismatch degree of voltage and reactive power sharing [19].…”
Section: Control Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%