2013 American Control Conference 2013
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2013.6579835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal motion planning with the half-car dynamical model for autonomous high-speed driving

Abstract: Abstract-We investigate the application of the RRT * optimal motion planning algorithm to autonomous high-speed driving. Specifically, we discuss the implementation of RRT * for the halfcar dynamical model. To enable fast solutions of the associated local steering problem, we observe that the motion of a special point (viz., the front center of oscillation) can be modeled as a double integrator augmented with fictitious inputs. We first map the constraints on tire friction forces to constraints on these augmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model works well for low speeds or less aggressive driving behaviors. 2) Combined Slip Model with Load Transfer: Combined breaking and steering is one of the most essential aspects of vehicle safety and motivates our choice for a combined slip model [31]. Specifically, we allow load transfer between the front and rear tires -a technique often used by rally racing drivers to control the yaw dynamics [32].…”
Section: Motion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model works well for low speeds or less aggressive driving behaviors. 2) Combined Slip Model with Load Transfer: Combined breaking and steering is one of the most essential aspects of vehicle safety and motivates our choice for a combined slip model [31]. Specifically, we allow load transfer between the front and rear tires -a technique often used by rally racing drivers to control the yaw dynamics [32].…”
Section: Motion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…µ α,max is the maximum allowed friction coefficient. The constraint essentially limits the yaw rate dependent on the state z, prohibiting unsafe driving modes suitable even for race-car driving under significant amounts of slip [31]. The constraints on steering speed |δ| ≤δ max , steering angle |δ| ≤ δ max , longitudinal speed, v x ≤ v x,max , remain the same with an additional constraint on the lateral velocity |v y | ≤ v y,max .…”
Section: Motion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RRTs have also explicitly addressed differential constraints [7]- [9], but equations of motion, which cannot be neglected when considering, for example, nonholonomic or automotive systems, are not trivially incorporated into the traditional RRT framework. To connect two nodes is a twopoint boundary value problem, and in general there are no guarantees that a solution exists [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their controller-driven variants are usually obtained by integration of a specific extend procedure into the planner. Utilized extend procedures range from general optimal-control approches such as [40], through spline path segments (e.g., [18,54]), to more controller-driven approaches such as simulation of mobile robot with closed-loop control system proposed in [38] and control-Lyapunov function approach from [39]. Sampling-based algorithms are attractive due to their generality and ability to cope with virtually any robot and motion environment model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%