2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2012.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal stopping of strong Markov processes

Abstract: We characterize the value function and the optimal stopping time for a large class of optimal stopping problems where the underlying process to be stopped is a fairly general Markov process. The main result is inspired by recent findings for Lévy processes obtained essentially via the Wiener-Hopf factorization. The main ingredient in our approach is the representation of the β-excessive functions as expected suprema. A variety of examples is given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a more advanced application of the method in the previous example, we consider a Markov process on the real line. To construct an equilibrium stopping time for a wide class of examples, we consider the general setting of [12] for the auxiliary optimal stopping problems with value function v y (x) = sup τ E x (e −rτ F (X τ , y)), y ∈ R. (4.1)…”
Section: A Class Of One-sided Solvable Problems With Potential Jumpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a more advanced application of the method in the previous example, we consider a Markov process on the real line. To construct an equilibrium stopping time for a wide class of examples, we consider the general setting of [12] for the auxiliary optimal stopping problems with value function v y (x) = sup τ E x (e −rτ F (X τ , y)), y ∈ R. (4.1)…”
Section: A Class Of One-sided Solvable Problems With Potential Jumpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Villeneuve () gives sufficient conditions to have threshold optimal strategies, and Arkin () gives necessary and sufficient conditions for Itô diffusions with C 2 payoffs functions to have one‐sided solutions, whereas Arkin and Slastnikov () and Crocce and Mordecki () give also necessary and sufficient conditions in different and more general diffusion frameworks. For more general Markov processes, Christensen and Irle (), Christensen, Salminen, and Ta (), and Mordecki and Salminen () propose verification results for one‐sided solutions, but also for problems where the optimal stopping time is of the form τ=inffalse{t00pt:X(t)(x,x)false}.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal threshold is then found to be the root of Q ν . Using the results discussed in Subsection 7.7 below, it follows from the discussion in Christensen et al (2013), Subsection 3.3, that Q ν coincides with our function f from (3). As the roots of f (y) =…”
Section: The Novikov-shiryaev Problemmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The results for random walks (and Lévy processes) are based on the Wiener-Hopf factorization and the results in the general Markov case heavily rely on representation results for excessive functions. Another main difference is that in this paper we give an explicit formula for the function f , which allows to obtain general results such as Theorem 6.1, whereas the existence of a representing functionf in (7) is not clear in general (but see the discussion in Christensen et al (2013), Subsection 2.2 and -for the Lévy process case using Fourier techniques -Lemma 3.1 in Surya (2007)). Another related approach is described in Woodroofe et al (1994).…”
Section: Connection To Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%