2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal technology selection for the biogas upgrading to biomethane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After the cleaning stage, biogas can be directly combusted in the microturbine unit for electricity production. 30 Another possibility is to remove the CO2 contained in biogas through a pressure swing adsorption system for producing bio-based CH4, 31 which can be directly fed to the natural gas grid or liquefied to obtain liquified biomethane. 32 An additional configuration is the use of biomethane gas for electricity production in a turbine, which is similar to the direct combustion of biogas but achieving better efficiencies as a result of the removal of CO2.…”
Section: Overview Of Bio-based Waste Treatment Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the cleaning stage, biogas can be directly combusted in the microturbine unit for electricity production. 30 Another possibility is to remove the CO2 contained in biogas through a pressure swing adsorption system for producing bio-based CH4, 31 which can be directly fed to the natural gas grid or liquefied to obtain liquified biomethane. 32 An additional configuration is the use of biomethane gas for electricity production in a turbine, which is similar to the direct combustion of biogas but achieving better efficiencies as a result of the removal of CO2.…”
Section: Overview Of Bio-based Waste Treatment Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement of biogas upgrading techniques is strictly connected to advantageous economic perspectives, widening the environmental and social benefits of AD [ 12 , 13 ]. Several approaches can be used for removing CO 2 from biogas, such as pressure swing adsorption, scrubbing, cryogenic and membrane separations [ 2 , 14 ]. Among them, membrane separation presents the lowest overall costs, with multistage configurations able to provide methane recovery and purity of 99% and 95–99%, respectively, compared to single-stage configurations [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tao et al [37] carried out an integrated design of multi-stage membrane separation systems with uncertain concentrations and flowrates, proposing three landfill gas purification strategies. Martín-Hernández et al [38] developed a superstructure model integrating amine absorption, pressure swing adsorption and membrane separation to determine the optimal process and operating conditions for biomethane production. However, as yet there was no such approach developed for the separation of hydrolysis solutions in bioethanol production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%