Optimal treatment strategy of fremanezumab in migraine prevention: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Abstract

Identifying the optimal fremanezumab treatment strategy is crucial in treating patients with migraines. The optimal strategy was investigated by assessing the cumulative 50% reduction rate (50%CRR), cumulative 75% reduction rate (75%CRR), reduction in the number of migraine days, treatment-related adverse events, and serious adverse events in patients treated with fremanezumab 225 mg monthly (225 mg), 675 mg monthly (675 mg), 900 mg monthly (900 mg), a single high dose of 675 mg (S675mg), 675 mg at baseline with 225 mg monthly (675/225 mg), and placebo. Biomedical databases were searched for randomized controlled trials on this topic, and data were individually extracted. Risk ratios and mean differences were used to present the pooled results. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to determine the effects of the medication strategies of fremanezumab. Five trials (n = 3404) were used to form a six-node network meta-analysis. All fremanezumab medication strategies displayed significantly higher cumulative 50% reduction rates than the placebo. The SUCRA revealed that treatment with 675 mg yielded the highest 50%CRR value (mean rank = 2.5). S675 mg was the only treatment with significantly higher 75%CRR reduction rate than placebo, whereas the SUCRA for 225 mg displayed the highest mean rank (2.2). Moreover, 225 mg (mean rank = 2.2) and S675 mg (mean rank = 2.2) presented lower probabilities of serious adverse events. Collectively, S675mg and 225 mg exhibited the optimal balance between efficacy and safety within three months. Long-term efficacy and safety remain unclear, and future studies should further evaluate the long-term outcomes.

Psoriasis and Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“…The types of eligible studies included cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies. Two experienced reviewers (Ma and Wu) independently performed the literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment [19][20][21]. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus among the reviewers or referred to a third reviewer (Dai).…”

Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab as preventive treatment for episodic/chronic migraine: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…The results from our study further proved that anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies may become an effective and safe therapeutic agents for migraine. Previously published meta-analysis studies regarding earlier available anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies, such as erenumab, 15,25 galcanezumab 14,26,27 and fremanezumab 13,28 also showed a positive and significant results toward prevention of migraine. Unfortunately, until now, there is no clinical trial or observational studies, which directly compare the effectiveness of these anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for the management of migraine.…”

Ocular Abnormalities in Patients with Vitiligo: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“…The types of eligible studies included cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies. Two experienced reviewers (S.-H. Ma and P.-C. Wu) independently performed the literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment [9, 17, 18]. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus among the reviewers or referred to a third reviewer (Y.-X.…”