2019
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2019.2916646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Universal Learning Machines for Quantum State Discrimination

Abstract: We consider the problem of correctly classifying a given quantum two-level system (qubit) which is known to be in one of two equally probable quantum states. We assume that this task should be performed by a quantum machine which does not have at its disposal a complete classical description of the two template states, but can only have partial prior information about their level of purity and mutual overlap. Moreover, similarly to the classical supervised learning paradigm, we assume that the machine can be t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, we have full knowledge about the meaning of the possible labels. Supervised quantum learning algorithms for quantum state classification [14][15][16][17] consider the intermediate scenario with limited training data. In this case, no description of the states is available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, we have full knowledge about the meaning of the possible labels. Supervised quantum learning algorithms for quantum state classification [14][15][16][17] consider the intermediate scenario with limited training data. In this case, no description of the states is available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in particular distinguishes our work from previous results on quantum circuit learning, in particular very recent study in e.g. [43], who only optimise circuits for specific inputs. Note that prior work hence does not consider the generalisation ability and hence does not treat the actual learning problem which is aiming at optimisation as well as generalisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This training process generalizes well for the discrimination tasks on new data, i.e., states from the parameter range which have not been seen during the training process. This distinguishes our work from previous results on quantum circuit learning, in particular the very recent study in Fanizza et al (2018), which only optimizes circuits for specific inputs. Note that this prior work hence does not consider the generalization ability and hence does not treat the actual learning problem, which aims at optimization as well as generalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%