2009
DOI: 10.1134/s0965542509070069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimality conditions and newton-type methods for mathematical programs with vanishing constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact might be used to establish some nonsmooth versions of Newton Method for MPCC (cf. [54,58]). This is an issue of current research.…”
Section: Characterization Of Strong Stability For C-stationary Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This fact might be used to establish some nonsmooth versions of Newton Method for MPCC (cf. [54,58]). This is an issue of current research.…”
Section: Characterization Of Strong Stability For C-stationary Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is motivated by the fact that the constraint G m does not play any role whenever H m is active. We refer to [43,44,45,46,57,56] for more details on optimality conditions, constraint qualifications, sensitivity and numerical methods for MPVC. Note that additional constraints G m (x) ≥ 0, m = 1, .…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Hoheisel and Kanzow [31] investigated necessary and sufficient optimality conditions through Abadie and Guignard type constraint qualifications for mathematical programs with vanishing constraints. For more details on the MPVC, we refer to [16,32,33] and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical foundations, i.e. optimality, stationarity, criticality and constraint qualifications have been established in the literature by Hoheisel et al [13][14][15][16][17] and other authors [10,22]. Numerical schemes based on smoothing and relaxation were studied by Hoheisel et al [1,2,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%