2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2014.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimally conditioned instrumental variable approach for frequency-domain system identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 16 th order successful industrial case study is presented in [22]. Furthermore, an experimental example and comparison with pre-existing approaches is presented in [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A 16 th order successful industrial case study is presented in [22]. Furthermore, an experimental example and comparison with pre-existing approaches is presented in [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , m, two distinct polynomial bases are required in order to achieve bi-orthogonality with respect to the general bi-linear form (21), whereas ii) for symmetric positive definite weights w T 1k w 1k , as encountered in the inner product (22), it is possible to achieve orthogonality with a single polynomial basis, since in that case S ij = 0 ∀ i, j = 0, 1, . .…”
Section: B Achieving Optimal Numerical Conditioning Through the Use mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The obtained frequency resolution is 0.5 Hz. The parametric model bold-italicĴ(z) is estimated using an iterative identification procedure in . The resulting underlying state‐space model for bold-italicĴ(z) is of 44th order.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it is explicitly indicated in earlier overviews of the motion control field, e.g., already in Steinbuch and Norg (1998, Section 4.2, limitations of tools), that modeling tools are not readily available. Third, besides the fact that many system identification approaches with different criteria have been developed, a significant number of results addressing issues with the numerical implementation of these methods have been developed, including frequency scaling (Pintelon and Kollár, 2005), amplitude scaling (Hakvoort and Van den Hof, 1994), the use of classical orthonormal polynomials and orthogonal rational functions (Heuberger et al, 2005, Section 3.1), (Ninness et al, 2000), (Ninness and Hjalmarsson, 2001), and more recently the use of orthonormal basis functions with respect to a discrete databased inner product (Bultheel et al, 2005), (Van Herpen et al, 2014). Related numerical issues are also seen in subspace identification, see e.g., Verdult et al (2002) and Chiuso and Giorgio (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%